dc.contributor.author
Feixas, Guillem
dc.contributor.author
Paz, Clara
dc.contributor.author
García Grau, Eugeni
dc.contributor.author
Montesano del Campo, Adrián
dc.contributor.author
Medina, Joan C.
dc.contributor.author
Bados López, Arturo
dc.contributor.author
Trujillo, Adriana
dc.contributor.author
Ortíz, Eliana
dc.contributor.author
Compañ Felipe, Victoria
dc.contributor.author
Salla, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Aguilera, Mari
dc.contributor.author
Guasch, Víctor
dc.contributor.author
Codina, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Winter, David A.
dc.date
2019-04-17T09:40:43Z
dc.date
2019-04-17T09:40:43Z
dc.identifier.citation
Feixas, G., Paz, C., García-Grau, E., Montesano, A., Medina, J. C., Bados, A., . . . Winter, D. A. (2018). One-year follow-up of a randomized trial with a dilemma-focused intervention for depression: Exploring an alternative to problem-oriented strategies. PLoS ONE, 13(12) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208245
dc.identifier.citation
1932-6203
dc.identifier.citation
10.1371/journal.pone.0208245
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/93311
dc.description.abstract
Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is aimed to counteract cognitions and behaviours that are considered as dysfunctional. The aim of the study is to test whether the inclusion of a non-counteractive approach (dilemma-focused intervention, DFI) in combination with CBT group therapy will yield better short- and long-term outcomes than an intervention conducted entirely using CBT. Method: A total of 128 patients with depression and at least one cognitive conflict, of six health community centres in Barcelona, participated from November of 2011 to December of 2014 in seven weekly group CBT sessions and were then randomly allocated to either DFI or CBT (eight individual sessions each) by an independent researcher. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II at baseline, at the end of therapy and threeand twelve-month follow-ups. Therapists did not participate in any of the assessments nor in the randomisation of patients and evaluators were masked to group assignment. Both intention to treat and complete case analyses were performed using linear mixed models with random effects. Findings: According to intention-to-treat analysis (F2, 179 = 0.69) and complete case analysis (F2, 146 = 0.88), both conditions similarly reduced the severity of symptoms across posttreatment assessments. For the 77 participants (CBTgroup +CBTindividual = 40; CBTgroup+DFIindividual = 37) that completed allocated treatment and one-year follow-up assessment, response and remission rates were relative higher for the DFI condition, however no significant differences were found between treatment conditions. The relapse rates were similar between treatment conditions (CBTgroup +CBTindividual = 7/20; CBTgroup+DFIindividual = 8/22). Interpretation: Although using a counteractive approach across all the treatment sessions is quite effective, it does not seem to be necessary to produce significant improvement. DFI may be considered as an alternative, which could be included in a wider treatment for depression.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208245&type=printable
dc.rights
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</a>
dc.subject
Depression, Mental
dc.subject
Depressió psíquica
dc.subject
Depresión mental
dc.title
One-year follow-up of a randomized trial with a dilemma-focused intervention for depression: Exploring an alternative to problem-oriented strategies
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article