dc.contributor.author
Vázquez Hernández, Daniel
dc.identifier
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/222684
dc.identifier
urn:10.1590/0100-6045.2019.V42N3.DV
dc.identifier
urn:oai:ddd.uab.cat:222684
dc.identifier
urn:scopus_id:85074357857
dc.identifier
urn:articleid:2317630Xv42n3p47
dc.identifier
urn:oai:egreta.uab.cat:publications/39a50b3a-744e-4bbf-a023-89604b891425
dc.description.abstract
Altres ajuts: FAPESP/2016/11848-9
dc.description.abstract
The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Manuscrito ; Vol. 42, núm. 3 (2019), p. 47-85
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Agrippa's trilemma
dc.title
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement