Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices : the V questionnaire

dc.contributor.author
Ruiz Díaz, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.author
Egea García, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz Aguilera, Roberto
dc.contributor.author
Viñolas, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Silvestre García, Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez Orozco, María
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Ferrer, José
dc.contributor.author
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
dc.date.issued
2020
dc.identifier
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/227738
dc.identifier
urn:10.1186/s12913-020-05216-3
dc.identifier
urn:oai:ddd.uab.cat:227738
dc.identifier
urn:pmid:32334573
dc.identifier
urn:pmcid:PMC7183665
dc.identifier
urn:pmc-uid:7183665
dc.identifier
urn:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7183665
dc.description.abstract
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has demonstrated substantial benefits. Treatment guidelines have therefore endorsed its use and is being increasingly adopted in the clinical setting, but the level of satisfaction they convey remains still unknown. We developed and validated a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with remote monitoring using Medtronic CareLink® Network and assessed its internal reliability and dimensional validity. After a thorough literature review, cognitive debriefing of 18 patients, and an expert panel discussion, a 30-item instrument was proposed and grouped into 5 dimensions (items): 1- Information on cardiac condition (3), 2- Device convenience (3), 3- Transmission process (6), 4- Satisfaction with medical monitoring (8), and 5- General opinions (10). Correlation with the visual analog scale (VAS), overall health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by the EuroQoL-5D accompanied by the VAS as well as with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) SF-36 were assessed. Psychometric properties, exploratory factor analysis and a second order confirmatory factor analysis (a hierarchical CFA with a general common factor explaining the relations between the first order common factors, See Figure 1) were estimated. Models were assessed based on item loading size, sign and statistical significance, and goodness-of-fit statistics. A total of 186 patients (77% male) with a mean age of 66.03 (SD = 13.94) years were assessed. 48% had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, 24% had pacemakers, and 29% had cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. An overall Cronbach's α = 0.893 was achieved, with acceptable reliabilities for isolated dimensions. Correlations with corresponding VAS scales were meaningful and significant (p < 0.01). The second order factor solution yielded good goodness-of-fit indexes (χ 2 /df = 1.44, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.05). Satisfaction with remote monitoring was not related to HRQoL (r < 0.05), except for the correlation between the SF-36 mental component and the information on cardiac condition dimension (r = 0.263, p < 0.001). The 30-item questionnaire showed good reliability and validity to assess satisfaction with remote monitoring in patients with CIEDs.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation
BMC health services research ; Vol. 20 (april 2020)
dc.rights
open access
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.title
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices : the V questionnaire
dc.type
Article


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)