Automated detection and quantification of reverse triggering effort under mechanical ventilation

dc.contributor.author
Pham, Tài
dc.contributor.author
Montanya, Jaume
dc.contributor.author
Telias, Irene
dc.contributor.author
Piraino, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Magrans, Rudys
dc.contributor.author
Coudroy, Rémi
dc.contributor.author
Damiani, L. Felipe
dc.contributor.author
Mellado Artigas, Ricard
dc.contributor.author
Madorno, Matías
dc.contributor.author
Blanch, Lluís
dc.contributor.author
Brochard, Laurent
dc.contributor.author
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina
dc.date.issued
2021
dc.identifier
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/236930
dc.identifier
urn:10.1186/s13054-020-03387-3
dc.identifier
urn:oai:ddd.uab.cat:236930
dc.identifier
urn:pmcid:PMC7883535
dc.identifier
urn:pmc-uid:7883535
dc.identifier
urn:pmid:33588912
dc.identifier
urn:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7883535
dc.identifier
urn:oai:egreta.uab.cat:publications/634efb4e-bfbf-45fb-84bb-1e05489915e8
dc.description.abstract
Reverse triggering (RT) is a dyssynchrony defined by a respiratory muscle contraction following a passive mechanical insufflation. It is potentially harmful for the lung and the diaphragm, but its detection is challenging. Magnitude of effort generated by RT is currently unknown. Our objective was to validate supervised methods for automatic detection of RT using only airway pressure (Paw) and flow. A secondary objective was to describe the magnitude of the efforts generated during RT. We developed algorithms for detection of RT using Paw and flow waveforms. Experts having Paw, flow and esophageal pressure (Pes) assessed automatic detection accuracy by comparison against visual assessment. Muscular pressure (Pmus) was measured from Pes during RT, triggered breaths and ineffective efforts. Tracings from 20 hypoxemic patients were used (mean age 65 ± 12 years, 65% male, ICU survival 75%). RT was present in 24% of the breaths ranging from 0 (patients paralyzed or in pressure support ventilation) to 93.3%. Automatic detection accuracy was 95.5%: sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 99.4%, positive predictive value 97.6%, negative predictive value 95.0% and kappa index of 0.87. Pmus of RT ranged from 1.3 to 36.8 cmH0, with a median of 8.7 cmH0. RT with breath stacking had the highest levels of Pmus, and RTs with no breath stacking were of similar magnitude than pressure support breaths. An automated detection tool using airway pressure and flow can diagnose reverse triggering with excellent accuracy. RT generates a median Pmus of 9 cmHO with important variability between and within patients. BEARDS, NCT03447288.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation
Agencia Estatal de Investigación RTC-2017-6193-1
dc.relation
Critical care ; Vol. 25 (february 2021)
dc.rights
open access
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Reverse triggering
dc.subject
Dyssynchrony
dc.subject
Mechanical ventilation
dc.subject
Lung and diaphragm protection
dc.subject
Respiratory muscles
dc.title
Automated detection and quantification of reverse triggering effort under mechanical ventilation
dc.type
Article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)