Rectal, central venous, gastric and bladder pressures versus esophageal pressure for the measurement of cough strength : a prospective clinical comparison

dc.contributor.author
Aguilera, Lluís G.
dc.contributor.author
Gallart, Lluís
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez, Juan C.
dc.contributor.author
Vallès, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Gea Guiral, Joaquim
dc.contributor.author
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Cirurgia
dc.date.issued
2018
dc.identifier
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/253665
dc.identifier
urn:10.1186/s12931-018-0897-6
dc.identifier
urn:oai:ddd.uab.cat:253665
dc.identifier
urn:pmcid:PMC6167780
dc.identifier
urn:pmc-uid:6167780
dc.identifier
urn:pmid:30285741
dc.identifier
urn:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6167780
dc.identifier
urn:oai:egreta.uab.cat:publications/2dc50fa0-63ed-4e27-9672-07194798bff2
dc.identifier
urn:scopus_id:85054308296
dc.description.abstract
Cough pressure, an expression of expiratory muscle strength, is usually measured with esophageal or gastric balloons, but these invasive catheters can be uncomfortable for the patient or their placement impractical. Because pressure in the thorax and abdomen are expected to be similar during a cough, we hypothesized that measurement at other thoracic or abdominal locations might also be similar as well as useful in clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare cough pressures measured at thoracic and abdominal sites that could serve as alternatives to esophageal pressures (P). Nine patients scheduled for laparotomy were asked to cough as forcefully as possible from total lung capacity in supine position. Three cough maneuvers were performed while P (the gold standard) as well as gastric, central venous, bladder and rectal pressures (P, P, P, and P, respectively) were measured simultaneously. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements in each patient at each site and evaluate agreement between alternative sites (P, P, P, and P) and P. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare P and the measurements at the other sites. Median (first quartile, third quartile) maximum pressures were as follows: P 112 (89,148), P 105 (92,156), P 102 (91,149), P 118 (93,157), and P 103 (88,150) cmHO. The ICCs showed excellent within-site repeatability of the measurements (p < 0.001) and excellent agreement between alternative sites and P (p < 0.004). The Bland-Altman plots showed minimal differences between P, P, P, and P. However, P was higher than the other pressures in most patients, and the difference between P and P was slightly larger. Cough pressure can be measured in the esophagus, stomach, superior vena cava or rectum, since their values are similar. It can also be measured in the bladder, although the value will be slightly higher. These results potentially facilitate the assessment of dynamic expiratory muscle strength with fewer invasive catheter placements in most hospitalized patients, thus providing an option that will be particularly useful in those undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgery.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation
Instituto de Salud Carlos III FISPI030127
dc.relation
Respiratory Research ; Vol. 19 (october 2018)
dc.rights
open access
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Respiratory muscles [A02.633.567.900]
dc.subject
Abdominal muscles [A02.633.567.050]
dc.subject
Cough [C23.888.852.293]
dc.subject
Laparotomy [E04.406]
dc.title
Rectal, central venous, gastric and bladder pressures versus esophageal pressure for the measurement of cough strength : a prospective clinical comparison
dc.type
Article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)