dc.contributor.author
Nasir, Memoona
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez-Prado, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Simoni, Marica
dc.contributor.author
Martín Orúe, Susana M
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Hernández, José Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Calsamiglia, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-17T08:41:41Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-17T08:41:41Z
dc.identifier
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/318776
dc.identifier
urn:10.3390/ani15142105
dc.identifier
urn:oai:ddd.uab.cat:318776
dc.identifier
urn:scopus_id:105011604804
dc.identifier
urn:articleid:20762615v15n14p2105
dc.identifier
urn:pmid:40723567
dc.identifier
urn:pmc-uid:12291954
dc.identifier
urn:pmcid:PMC12291954
dc.identifier
urn:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:12291954
dc.identifier
urn:oai:egreta.uab.cat:publications/c5bb3b23-03d9-4f7b-bb9d-54e72b054d35
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/2072/486889
dc.description.abstract
Ruminant livestock contribute significantly to methane emissions, necessitating sustainable mitigation strategies. Essential oils (EOs) show promise for modulating ruminal fermentation, but their synergistic effects remain underexplored. Two 24 h in vitro experiments evaluated the synergistic effects of EO blends on rumen microbial fermentation. Exp. 1 screened five oils using two triad combinations. Triad 1 tested 10 combinations of thyme (THY), peppermint (PPM), and cinnamon leaf (CIN) oils. Triad 2 tested 10 combinations of anise (ANI), clove leaf (CLO), and peppermint (PPM) oils. Each blend was tested at 400 mg/L, using batch culture methods measuring: pH, ammonia-N (NH-N), and volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The two most effective blends, designated as T1 and T2, were selected for Exp. 2 to assess total gas and methane (CH) production using pressure transducer methods. All treatments were incubated in a rumen fluid-buffer mix with a 50:50 forage-to-concentrate substrate (pH 6.6). In Exp. 1, data were analyzed according to the Simplex Centroid Design using R-Studio. In Exp. 2, an analysis was conducted using the MIXED procedure in SAS. Mean comparisons were assessed through Tukey's test. The results from Exp. 1 identified CIN+PPM (80:20) and ANI+CLO (80:20) as optimal combinations, both increasing total VFAs while reducing acetate/propionate ratios and NH-N concentrations. In Exp. 2, both combinations significantly reduced total gas and CH productions compared to the control, with CIN+PPM achieving the greatest methane reduction (similar to monensin, the positive control). Specific essential oil combinations demonstrated synergistic effects in modulating rumen fermentation and reducing methane emissions, offering potential for sustainable livestock production. Further in vivo validation is required to optimize dosing and assess long-term effects on animal performance.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Animals ; Vol. 15 Núm. 14 (july 2025), p. 2105
dc.rights
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Essential oils
dc.subject
Feed additives
dc.subject
Methane mitigation
dc.subject
Rumen fermentation
dc.subject
Synergistic effects
dc.title
Optimizing Essential Oil Mixtures : Synergistic Effects on Cattle Rumen Fermentation and Methane Emission