Nature-based solutions for antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance removal in tertiary wastewater treatment: Microbiological composition and risk assessment

Solucions basades en la natura per a l'eliminació d'antibiòtics i resistències antimicrobianes en el tractament terciari d'aigües residuals: composició microbiològica i avaluació del risc;
Soluciones basadas en la naturaleza para la eliminación de antibióticos y resistencias antimicrobianas en el tratamiento terciario de aguas residuales: composición microbiológica y evaluación del riesgo

Other authors

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Doctorat en Enginyeria Ambiental

Publication date

2024-09-01

Abstract

This field-scale study evaluates the seasonal effectiveness of employing nature-based solutions (NBSs), particularly surface flow and horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland configurations, as tertiary treatment technologies for the removal of antibiotics (ABs) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) compared to a conventional treatment involving UV and chlorination. Out of the 21 monitored ABs, 13 were detected in the influent of three tertiary wastewater treatments, with concentrations ranging from 2 to 1218 ng·L-1. The ARGs sul1 and dfrA1 exhibited concentrations ranging from 1 × 105 to 9 × 106 copies/100 mL. NBSs were better at reducing ABs (average 69 to 88 %) and ARGs (2–3 log units) compared to the conventional tertiary system (average 36 to 39 % and no removal to 2 log units) in both seasons. Taxonomic compositions in influent water samples shifted from wastewater-impacted communities (Actinomycetota and Firmicutes) to a combination of plant rhizosphere-associated and river communities in NBS effluents (Alphaproteobacteria). In contrast, the conventional technology showed no substantial differences in community composition. Moreover, NBSs substantially reduced the ecotoxicological risk assessment (cumulative RQs). Furthermore, NBSs reduced the ecotoxicological risk (cumulative RQs) by an average of over 70 % across seasons, whereas the benchmark technology only achieved a 6 % reduction. In conclusion, NBSs present a robust alternative for minimizing the discharge of ABs and ARGs into surface water bodies.


The authors would like to thank the European Commission (and AEI, IFD, BMBF, FCT, and Sida) for funding in the frame of the collaborative international consortium (NATURE) financed under the 2020 AquaticPollutants Joint call of the AquaticPollutants ERA-NET Cofound (GA Nr. 869178). This ERA-NET is an integral part of the activities developed by the Water, Oceans and AMR JPIs. Thanks are also given to Diputació de Barcelona, Ajuntament de Granollers i el Consorci d'Aigües de la Costa Brava for their help during the sampling campaigns. Finally, the authors wish to thank Yolanda Rodríguez and Enric García for their valuable help in the chemical sample analysis and David Thiele for his help with Illumina sequencing and qPCR


Peer Reviewed


Postprint (published version)

Document Type

Article

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424009382

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Open Access

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

E-prints [72986]