Liquefaction-induced flow-like landslides: the case of Valarties (Spain)

Abstract

This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com.

This paper examines a flowslide involving a glacial deposit of low-plasticity silty sand triggered by a karstic spring after a rainfall period. The work aims at explaining the triggering, propagation and kinematics of flow-like landslides in a unique framework. In particular, a material point method open-source code, able to solve coupled hydro-mechanical problems for saturated/unsaturated soils, was developed. Laboratory and field experiments revealed a liquefaction potential of the mobilised material. To simulate such potential, a recent liquefaction model (Ta-Ger), validated so far at a laboratory scale, was selected, extended to unsaturated conditions, implemented and calibrated. The analysis indicates a complex behaviour of the moving mass and explains the mechanisms developing sequentially in the flowslide. The impact of the upper unstable soil mass against the soil at lower elevations is a key phenomenon to generalise soil liquefaction in the entire slope. Patterns of soil velocity and displacements are far from being a uniform flow of liquefied material. The model developed is a powerful tool to interpret flowslides involving a saturated and unsaturated soil profile. The paper includes sensitivity analyses and discusses the discrepancies observed in the run-up of the flowslide climbing on the opposite slope of the valley.

The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the project RTI2018‐097365‐B‐I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and, as appropriate, by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, by the “European Union” or by the “European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR”.

Peer Reviewed

Postprint (author's final draft)