dc.contributor.author
Prats-Sanchez, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Martınez-Domeño, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Camps-Renom, Pol
dc.contributor.author
Delgado-Mederos, Raquel
dc.contributor.author
Guisado-Alonso, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Marín, Rebeca
dc.contributor.author
Dorado, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Rudilosso, Salvatore
dc.contributor.author
Gómez-González, Alejandra
dc.contributor.author
Purroy, Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Gómez-Choco, Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Cánovas, David
dc.contributor.author
Cocho, Dolores
dc.contributor.author
Garcés, Moises
dc.contributor.author
Abilleira, Sonia
dc.contributor.author
Martí-Fàbregas, Joan
dc.date.issued
2018-07-17T09:40:23Z
dc.date.issued
2018-07-17T09:40:23Z
dc.identifier
Prats-Sanchez L, Martínez-Domeño A, Camps-Renom P, Delgado-Mederos R, Guisado-Alonso D, Marín R. et al. Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178284. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178284
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35176
dc.identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284
dc.description.abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be explained by different underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that rPH may have different risk factors according to the bleeding location. We report the variables that we found associated with deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These patients were included in a multicenter prospective registry. We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data. We evaluated the number and distribution of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We excluded patients treated endovascularly, patients with parenchymal hemorrhage without concomitant rPH and stroke mimics. We compared the variables from patients with deep or lobar rPH with those with no intracranial hemorrhage.
RESULTS: We studied 934 patients (mean age 73.9±12.6 years) and 52.8% were men. We observed rPH in 34 patients (3.6%); 9 (0.9%) were deep and 25 (2.7%) lobar. No hemorrhage was observed in 900 (96.6%) patients. Deep rPH were associated with hypertensive episodes within first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (77.7% vs 23.3%, p<0.001). Lobar rPH were associated with the presence of CMB (53.8% vs 7.9%, p<0.001), multiple (>1) CMB (30.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.003), lobar CMB (53.8% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and severe leukoaraiosis (76.9% vs 42%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure within the first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with deep rPH, whereas lobar rPH are associated with imaging markers of amyloid deposition. Thus, our results suggest that deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis may have different mechanisms.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178284
dc.rights
Copyright © 2017 Prats-Sanchez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Teràpia trombolítica
dc.title
Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion