dc.contributor.author
Villanueva Benito, Guillermo
dc.contributor.author
Goldberg, Ximena
dc.contributor.author
Brachowicz, Nicolai
dc.contributor.author
Castaño Vinyals, Gemma
dc.contributor.author
Blay, Natalia
dc.contributor.author
Espinosa, Ana
dc.contributor.author
Davidhi, Flavia
dc.contributor.author
Torres, Diego
dc.contributor.author
Kogevinas, Manolis
dc.contributor.author
Cid Ibeas, Rafael de
dc.contributor.author
Petrone, Paula M.
dc.date.issued
2024-11-26T07:34:50Z
dc.date.issued
2024-11-26T07:34:50Z
dc.identifier
Benito GV, Goldberg X, Brachowicz N, Castaño-Vinyals G, Blay N, Espinosa A, et al. Machine learning for anxiety and depression profiling and risk assessment in the aftermath of an emergency. Artif Intell Med. 2024 Nov;157:102991. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102991
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/68819
dc.identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102991
dc.description.abstract
Background & objectives: Mental health disorders pose an increasing public health challenge worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic highlighted gaps in preparedness, emphasizing the need for early identification of at-risk groups and targeted interventions. This study aims to develop a risk assessment tool for anxiety, depression, and self-perceived stress using machine learning (ML) and explainable AI to identify key risk factors and stratify the population into meaningful risk profiles. Methods: We utilized a cohort of 9291 individuals from Northern Spain, with extensive post-COVID-19 mental health surveys. ML classification algorithms predicted depression, anxiety, and self-reported stress in three classes: healthy, mild, and severe outcomes. A novel combination of SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) was employed to interpret model predictions and facilitate the identification of high-risk phenotypic clusters. Results: The mean macro-averaged one-vs-one AUROC was 0.77 (± 0.01) for depression, 0.72 (± 0.01) for anxiety, and 0.73 (± 0.02) for self-perceived stress. Key risk factors included poor self-reported health, chronic mental health conditions, and poor social support. High-risk profiles, such as women with reduced sleep hours, were identified for self-perceived stress. Binary classification of healthy vs. at-risk classes yielded F1-Scores over 0.70. Conclusions: Combining SHAP with UMAP for risk profile stratification offers valuable insights for developing effective interventions and shaping public health policies. This data-driven approach to mental health preparedness, when validated in real-world scenarios, can significantly address the mental health impact of public health crises like COVID-19.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Artif Intell Med. 2024 Nov;157:102991
dc.rights
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Machine learning
dc.title
Machine learning for anxiety and depression profiling and risk assessment in the aftermath of an emergency
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion