2,5-Dimethylfuran as a Validated Biomarker of Smoking Status

dc.contributor.author
Castellanos, María del Mar
dc.contributor.author
Suñer Soler, Rosa
dc.contributor.author
Fernández-Real Lemos, José Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez Navarro, Juan Manuel
dc.date.accessioned
2024-06-18T13:56:22Z
dc.date.available
2024-06-18T13:56:22Z
dc.date.issued
2019-06-01
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19553
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19553
dc.description.abstract
Introduction Exposure biomarkers are required in tobacco use studies to accurately assess smoking status since self-reporting usually results in misclassification estimates. This study uses breath analysis and assesses some volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as potential biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure. Methods Forced-expiratory breath samples were obtained from 377 volunteers (174 smokers and 203 nonsmokers). Exhaled breath levels of different VOCs previously related to tobacco smoke were evaluated. The toluene-to-benzene ratio was evaluated as this ratio has been found to be different in atmospheric samples and tobacco smoke emissions. Finally, breath analyses from 64 patients attending a clinical practice were evaluated and the results were compared to their self-reporting status. Results Univariate analysis shows that all compounds evaluated gave significant differences (p < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves suggest that xylenes and toluene are not able to accurately determine smoking status, and benzene and the T/B ratio present potential utility in certain conditions. The highest discriminant capacity was obtained for 2,5-dimethylfuran (AUC = 0.982, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.969-0.995), with a cut-off value of 0.016 ppbv (sensibility = 0.965, specificity = 0.896). Drinking coffee was the only confounding parameter that can give low breath levels for this compound. The evaluation of the results obtained from the patients attending a clinical practice showed that 8% of people who claim to be nonsmokers hid their real smoking status. Conclusions The results obtained confirm that the determination of 2,5-dimethylfuran in breath samples is a good and simpler alternative to conventional blood or urine tests for assessing smoking status
dc.description.abstract
This study has been supported by the University of Girona (MPCUdG2016/100)
dc.format
7 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/ntr/nty078
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1462-2203
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1469-994X
dc.rights
Tots els drets reservats
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
© Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2019, vol. 21, núm. 6, p. 828-834
dc.source
Articles publicats (D-Q)
dc.source
Castellanos, María del Mar Suñer Soler, Rosa Fernández-Real Lemos, José Manuel Sánchez Navarro, Juan Manuel 2019 2,5-Dimethylfuran as a Validated Biomarker of Smoking Status Nicotine & Tobacco Research 21 6 828 834
dc.subject
Hàbit de fumar
dc.subject
Fumadors
dc.subject
Marcadors bioquímics
dc.subject
Smoking
dc.subject
Cigarette smokers
dc.subject
Biochemical markers
dc.title
2,5-Dimethylfuran as a Validated Biomarker of Smoking Status
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type
peer-reviewed


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)