Clear Improvement in Real-World Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Survival: A Comparison With Randomized Controlled Trials

dc.contributor.author
Vener, Claudia
dc.contributor.author
Rossi, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Minicozzi, Pamela
dc.contributor.author
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
dc.contributor.author
Poirel, Hélène A.
dc.contributor.author
Maynadié, Marc
dc.contributor.author
Troussard, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Pravettoni, Gabriella
dc.contributor.author
De Angelis, Roberta
dc.contributor.author
Sant, Milena
dc.contributor.author
EUROCARE-6 Working Group
dc.date.accessioned
2024-10-29T21:24:51Z
dc.date.available
2024-10-29T21:24:51Z
dc.date.issued
2022-07-14
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/25148
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10256/25148
dc.description.abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been improving the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but there are still large differences in survival among European countries. This raises questions on the added value of results from population-based studies, which use real-world data, compared to results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with CML. There are also questions about the extent of the findings on RCTs effectiveness for patients in the general population. We compare survival data extracted from our previous systematic review and meta-analysis of CML RCTs with the latest updated population-based survival data of EUROCARE-6, the widest collaborative study on cancer survival in Europe. The EUROCARE-6 CML survival estimated in patients (15–64 years) diagnosed in 2000–2006 vs. 2007–2013 revealed that the prognostic improvement highlighted by RCTs was confirmed in real-world settings, too. The study shows, evaluating for the first time all European regions, that the optimal outcome figures obtained in controlled settings for CML are also achievable (and indeed achieved) in real-world settings with prompt introduction of TKIs in daily clinical practice. However, some differences still persist, particularly in Eastern European countries, where overall survival values are lower than elsewhere, probably due to a delayed introduction of TKIs. Our results suggest an insufficient adoption of adequate protocols in daily clinical practice in those countries where CML survival values remain lower in real life than the values obtained in RCTs. New high-resolution population-based studies may help to identify failures in the clinical pathways followed there
dc.description.abstract
This study was funded by the Compagnia di San Paolo, the Cariplo Foundation and the European Commission (grant number 801520 HP-JA-2017, Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer, iPAAC Joint Action)
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Frontier Media
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fonc.2022.892684
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2234-943X
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Frontiers in Oncology, 2022, vol.12, art. núm. 892684
dc.source
Articles publicats (IdIBGi)
dc.subject
Leucèmia mieloide crònica
dc.subject
Myeloid leukemia
dc.subject
Assaigs clínics
dc.subject
Clinical trials
dc.title
Clear Improvement in Real-World Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Survival: A Comparison With Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
peer-reviewed


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)