Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization Management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are very often incomplete, or conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified procedure. This paper presents an argumentative approach to cope with the above problem based on Defeasible Logic Programming, a logic programming formalism for defeasible argumentation. Conflicts among policies are solved on the basis of a dialectical analysis whose outcome determines to which specific users different pieces of knowledge are to be delivered.
This work was supported by the Monterrey Tech CAT-011 research chair, by Projects TIC2001-1577-C03-01 and TIC2003-00950, by Ram´on y Cajal Program (MCyT, Spain) and by CONICET (Argentina).
Inglés
Defeasible Argumentation; Logic Programming; Knowledge management
Springer Verlag
MICYT/PN2000-2003/TIC2001-1577-C03-01
MICYT/PN2000-2003/TIC2003-00950
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1007/11424918_26
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3501, p. 244-256
(c) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005
Documents de recerca [17848]