The Draft Regulation on a Common European Sales Law (CESL) deals with prescription in Articles 178 to 186. This paper discusses the level of legal harmonization supposedly achieved within the European Union concerning extinctive prescription. A number of significant inaccuracies that might substantially affect the effectiveness and application of the Optional Instrument are noted, demanding an amendment before becoming EU law.
This article is part of the publications of the Spanish National Research Project MICINN DER2012-37898-C02-01 called “The Optional Instrument of European Contract Law”, and the activities of the consolidated research group “Catalan Civil Law and European Private Law” funded by the Generalitat de Catalunya (2014SGR223). The author is also a member of the Research Center CEJEM (Centro de Estudios Jurídicos Europeos y de Mediación), at the University of Lleida. She is grateful for the financial aid received to carry out this project. She is also grateful for the assistance provided by Ricard Serrano Barqué.
Inglés
Dret Comunitari Europeu; Dret contractual; Extinctive prescription; Effects of prescription; Running of the period; Suspension; Postponement of expiry; Prescription and party autonomy; Dret; Law
Wolters Kluwer
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//DER2012-37898-C02-01/ES/EL INSTRUMENTO OPCIONAL DE DERECHO CONTRACTUAL EUROPEO/
Versió postprint del document publicat a: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?pubcode=ERPL
European Review of Private Law, 2015, vol. 23, núm. 5, p. 751-775
(c) Wolters Kluwer, 2015
Documents de recerca [17848]