Institut Català de la Salut
[Tank A] BioPharmaceuticals Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. [Johnston SC] Harbor Health, Austin, Texas, USA. [Jain R] Parexel International, Bengaluru, India. [Amarenco P] Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France. [Mellström C] BioPharmaceuticals Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden. [Rikner K] AstraZeneca Nordics, Södertälje, Sweden. [Molina CA] Unitat d’Ictus, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2023-09-13T12:40:02Z
2023-09-13T12:40:02Z
2023-08-24
Health economics; Stroke
Economía de la salud; Ictus
Economia de la salut; Ictus
Objective THALES demonstrated that ticagrelor plus aspirin reduced the risk of stroke or death but increased bleeding versus aspirin during the 30 days following a mild-to-moderate acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (AIS) or high-risk transient ischaemic attack (TIA). There are no cost-effectiveness analyses supporting this combination in Europe. To address this, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Methods Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using a decision tree and Markov model with a short-term and long-term (30-year) horizon. Stroke, mortality, bleeding and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) data from THALES were used to estimate short-term outcomes. Model transitions were based on stroke severity (disabling stroke was defined as modified Rankin Scale >2). Healthcare resource utilisation and EQ-5D data beyond 30 days were based on SOCRATES, another trial in AIS/TIA that compared ticagrelor with aspirin. Long-term costs, survival and disutilities were based on published literature. Unit costs were derived from national databases and discounted at 3% annually from a Swedish healthcare perspective. Results One-month treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin resulted in 12 fewer strokes, 4 additional major bleeds and cost savings of €95 000 per 1000 patients versus aspirin from a Swedish healthcare perspective. This translated into increased quality-adjusted life-years (0.04) and reduced societal costs (−€1358) per patient over a lifetime horizon. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were number of patients experiencing subsequent disabling stroke and degree of disability. Findings were robust over a range of input assumptions. Conclusion One month of treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin is likely to improve outcomes and reduce costs versus aspirin in mild-to-moderate AIS or high-risk TIA.
AstraZeneca funded the THALES trial and the cost-effectiveness analysis of this study.
Article
Versió publicada
Anglès
Malalties cerebrovasculars - Tractament; Cost-eficàcia; PUBLIC HEALTH::Epidemiology and Biostatistics::Epidemiology::Uses of Epidemiology::Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation; DISEASES::Nervous System Diseases::Central Nervous System Diseases::Brain Diseases::Cerebrovascular Disorders::Stroke; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy; SALUD PÚBLICA::epidemiología y bioestadística::epidemiología::usos de la epidemiología::evaluación de coste-efectividad; ENFERMEDADES::enfermedades del sistema nervioso::enfermedades del sistema nervioso central::enfermedades cerebrales::trastornos cerebrovasculares::accidente cerebrovascular; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia
BMJ
BMJ Neurology Open;5(2)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2023-000478
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Articles científics - HVH [3439]