Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 immunohistochemistry PD-L1 assays for clinical efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III IMpower010 trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Zhou C] Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. [Srivastava MK] Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA. [Xu H] F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. [Felip E] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Wakelee H] Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA. [Altorki N] Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-11-14T13:18:26Z

2023-11-14T13:18:26Z

2023-10

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Non-small cell lung cancer; Tumor biomarkers


Inhibidors del punt de control immunitari; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites; Biomarcadors tumorals


Inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológico; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Biomarcadores tumorales


Background Tumor samples from the phase III IMpower010 study were used to compare two programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays (VENTANA SP263 and Dako 22C3) for identification of PD-L1 patient subgroups (negative, positive, low, and high expression) and their predictive value for adjuvant atezolizumab compared with best supportive care (BSC) in resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods PD-L1 expression was assessed by the SP263 assay, which measured the percentage of tumor cells with any membranous PD-L1 staining, and the 22C3 assay, which scored the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membranous PD-L1 staining. Results When examining the concordance at the PD-L1-positive threshold (SP263: tumor cell (TC)≥1%; 22C3: tumor proportion score (TPS)≥1%), the results were concordant between assays for 83% of the samples. Similarly, at the PD-L1–high cut-off (SP263: TC≥50%; 22C3: TPS≥50%), the results were concordant between assays for 92% of samples. The disease-free survival benefit of atezolizumab over BSC was comparable between assays for PD-L1-positive (TC≥1% by SP263: HR, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.85) vs TPS≥1% by 22C3: HR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.95)) and PD-L1-high (TC≥50% by SP263: HR, 0.27 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.53) vs TPS≥50% by 22C3: HR, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.60)) subgroups. Conclusions The SP263 and 22C3 assays showed high concordance and a comparable clinical predictive value of atezolizumab at validated PD-L1 thresholds, suggesting that both assays can identify patients with early-stage NSCLC most likely to experience benefit from adjuvant atezolizumab.


This work was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc, a member of the Roche Group. Editorial support, funded by the sponsor, was provided by an independent medical writer under the guidance of the authors.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

BMJ

Related items

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer;11(10)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007047

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)