Immune checkpoint blockers in solid organ transplant recipients and cancer: the INNOVATED cohort

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Remon J] Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif. [Auclin E] Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France. [Zubiri L] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. [Schneider S] Department Pneumology, Hôpital de Bayonne, Bayonne, France. [Rodriguez-Abreu D] Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. [Minatta N] Department of Oncology Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Muñoz-Couselo E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-04-30T09:24:56Z

2024-04-30T09:24:56Z

2024-04-22



Abstract

Cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Solid-organ transplant


Cáncer; Inhibidores de puntos de control inmunitario; Trasplante de órganos sólidos


Càncer; Inhibidors de punts de control immunitari; Trasplantament d'òrgans sòlids


Background Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) and solid tumors are usually excluded from clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). As transplant rates are increasing, we aimed to evaluate ICB outcomes in this population, with a special focus on lung cancer. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study collecting real data of ICB use in patients with SOT and solid tumors. Clinical data and treatment outcomes were assessed by using retrospective medical chart reviews in every participating center. Study endpoints were: overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events. Results From August 2016 to October 2022, 31 patients with SOT (98% kidney) and solid tumors were identified (36.0% lung cancer, 19.4% melanoma, 13.0% genitourinary cancer, 6.5% gastrointestinal cancer). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was positive in 29% of tumors. Median age was 61 years, 69% were males, and 71% received ICB as first-line treatment. In the whole cohort the ORR was 45.2%, with a 6-month PFS of 56.8%. In the lung cancer cohort, the ORR was 45.5%, with a 6-month PFS of 32.7%, and median overall survival of 4.6 months. The grade 3 immune-related adverse events rate leading to ICB discontinuation was 12.9%. Allograft rejection rate was 25.8%, and risk of rejection was similar regardless of the type of ICB strategy (monotherapy or combination, 28% versus 33%, P = 1.0) or response to ICB treatment. Conclusions ICB could be considered a feasible option for SOT recipients with some advanced solid malignancies and no alternative therapeutic options. Due to the risk of allograft rejection, multidisciplinary teams should be involved before ICB therapy.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

ESMO Open;9(5)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103004

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)