Oral quinolones versus intravenous β-lactam for the treatment of acute focal bacterial nephritis: a retrospective cohort study

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Aceituno L] Unitat del Fetge, Servei de Medicina Interna, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Nuñez-Conde A] Internal Medicine Department, Mútua Terrassa University Hospital, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. [Serra-Pladevall J] Microbiology Department, Vic Hospital, Vic, Spain. [Viñado B] Servei de Microbiologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Castella E] Servei de Radiologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Escolà-Vergé L] Infectious Diseases Unit, Medicine Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain. [Pigrau C, Falcó V] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Len O] CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain. Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-08-21T07:38:26Z

2024-08-21T07:38:26Z

2024-06-10



Abstract

Acute focal pyelonephritis; Quinolones; Urinary tract infections


Pielonefritis focal aguda; Quinolones; Infeccions del tracte urinari


Pielonefritis focal aguda; Quinolonas; Infecciones del tracto urinario


Background Evidence regarding the best antibiotic regimen and the route of administration to treat acute focal bacterial nephritis (AFBN) is scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) β-lactam antibiotics versus oral quinolones. Methods This is a retrospective single centre study of patients diagnosed with AFBN between January 2017 and December 2018 in Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona (Spain). Patients were identified from the diagnostic codifications database. Patients treated with oral quinolones were compared with those treated with IV β-lactam antibiotics. Therapeutic failure was defined as death, relapse, or evolution to abscess within the first 30 days. Results A total of 264 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of those, 103 patients (39%) received oral ciprofloxacin, and 70 (26.5%) IV β-lactam. The most common isolated microorganism was Escherichia coli (149, 73.8%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (26, 12.9%). Mean duration of treatment was 21.3 days (SD 7.9). There were no statistical differences regarding therapeutic failure between oral quinolones and IV β-lactam treatment (6.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.6). Out of the 66 patients treated with intravenous antibiotics, 4 (6.1%) experienced an episode of phlebitis and 1 patient (1.5%) an episode of catheter-related bacteraemia. Conclusions When susceptible, treatment of AFBN with oral quinolones is as effective as IV β-lactam treatment with fewer adverse events.


Open Access Funding provided by Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases;43

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04871-2

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)