Phase Ib/II trial of talimogene laherparepvec alone and with pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors with liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Hecht JR] UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA, United States. [Oberoi A] Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Departament de medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Garralda Cabanas E] Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Chon HJ] CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Bundang-Gu, South Korea. [Digklia A] Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. [Rottey S] Department of Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-05-09T06:00:47Z

2025-05-09T06:00:47Z

2025-03



Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver metastasis; Solid tumor


Carcinoma hepatocelular; Metástasis hepática; Tumor sólido


Carcinoma hepatocel·lular; Metàstasi hepàtica; Tumor sòlid


Background Newer effective therapies are needed for patients with solid tumors with liver metastases and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Part 1 (dose exploration) evaluated intrahepatic talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injection in group A (non-HCC liver metastases) and group B (HCC). Cohorts 1-4 received T-VEC monotherapy; cohorts 5 and 6 received T-VEC+pembrolizumab. Part 2 (dose expansion) evaluated intrahepatic or intratumoral T-VEC+pembrolizumab in non-HCC solid tumors. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in part 1; objective response rate (ORR) per modified irRC-RECIST and safety in part 2. Results Part 1 enrolled 28 and 46 patients to receive T-VEC and T-VEC+pembrolizumab, respectively. Three patients reported DLTs (T-VEC, n = 2 grade 3 abdominal pain and aspartate transaminase increase; T-VEC+pembrolizumab, n = 1 grade 3 cholestatic hepatitis). ORR (secondary endpoint) with T-VEC was 0%; ORR (95% CI) with T-VEC+pembrolizumab was 8.3% (1.0, 27.0) for non-HCC and 13.6% (2.9, 34.9) for HCC. Part 2 enrolled 53 patients; ORR (95% CI) was 0% (0.0, 30.8)-20.0% (0.5, 71.6) across 5 tumor types, with 16.7% (95% CI: 3.6, 41.4) for triple-negative breast cancer with the largest sample size (n = 18). Safety findings were consistent with the therapies administered. Conclusions Limited efficacy across tumor types evaluated limit further evaluation of intrahepatic T-VEC+pembrolizumab in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02509507.


Medical writing support was provided by Shubha Dastidar, PhD, CMPP (Cactus Life Sciences, part of Cactus Communications) and was funded by Amgen Inc. The study was sponsored and funded by Amgen Inc. This study is in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. This study was sponsored by Amgen Inc.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Related items

The Oncologist;30(3)

https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae203

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)