Hormonal factors predictive of fertility in patients with breast cancer interrupting adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy in POSITIVE trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Demeestere I] Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Fertility Clinic, H.U.B Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. [Niman SM] International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. [Partridge AH] Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. [Diego DS] Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. [Kammler R] Translational Research Coordination, International Breast Cancer Study Group, a Division of ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland. [Ruggeri M] Program for Young Patients, International Breast Cancer Study Group, a Division of ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland. [Saura C] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-10-03T08:32:27Z

2025-10-03T08:32:27Z

2025-10



Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology; Breast cancer; Pregnancy


Tecnologia de reproducció assistida; Càncer de mama; Embaràs


Tecnología de reproducción asistida; Cáncer de mama; Embarazo


Purpose The POSITIVE trial showed that premenopausal women with breast cancer (BC) can safely pause adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) to attempt conception. 74 % of patients conceived spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technology (ART); Investigating hormonal factors that predict fertility was a key secondary endpoint. Methods Hormonal factors were assessed in non-pregnant women at months 3, 6, and 12 after ET interruption. The frequency of low ovarian reserve, defined as anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 0.5 ng/mL at month 3, and of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), defined as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) > 25 IU/L at month 12, were primary measures. Secondary analyses to predict pregnancy included AMH, FSH, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin and ovulatory status (defined as progesterone >3 ng/mL at month 6), considering covariates such as age, treatment, and ART use. Results Of 518 women enrolled in POSITIVE, 438 were eligible for low ovarian reserve analysis. Low ovarian reserve was observed in 209 women (47.7 %), more frequently among older women and those with prior chemotherapy, but not in relation to ET type or duration. Overall, low ovarian reserve was associated with reduced odds of pregnancy (OR:0.52; 95 % CI:0.31–0.87). Of 142 patients evaluated for POI, 16.7 % of those who received prior chemotherapy experienced POI. FSH at month 3 was associated with POI, but only modestly with spontaneous pregnancy (OR:0.96; 95 %CI: 0.93–1.00); other factors were not predictive of pregnancy. Conclusion Hormonal factors are associated with pregnancy in BC patients pausing adjuvant ET to conceive, and their assessment may help to optimize fertility counseling. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02308085.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

The Breast;83

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2025.104547

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)