Positive cerebrospinal fluid in the 2024 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Deisenhammer F, Hegen H] Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. [Arrambide G] Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (CEMCAT), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Banwell BL] Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. [Coetzee T] National Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY, USA. [Gnanapavan S] Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. [Montalban X] Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (CEMCAT), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat de Vic/Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-11-17T07:27:42Z

2025-11-17T07:27:42Z

2025-10



Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid; Criteria; Diagnosis


Líquido cefalorraquídeo; Criterios; Diagnóstico


Líquid cefaloraquidi; Criteris; Diagnòstic


The 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) introduce kappa free light chains (κ-FLC) detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) which can be used interchangeably with oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) to demonstrate intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of κ-FLC is equal to OCB on a 95% confidence level. In rare cases determination of both, κ-FLC and OCB should be considered as the concordance rate is around 90%. We recommend calculating the κ-FLC index with values of ≥6.1 performing best for diagnosing MS. Validated turbidimetric or nephelometric assays should be applied for which proficiency testing programs are available. There is some prognostic use of the κ-FLC index with higher values predicting higher disease activity. Neurofilament light (NfL) should not be used for diagnostic purposes although it might be useful for prognosis and disease monitoring. All recommendations apply to paediatric and adult relapsing as well as progressive onset MS.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

eBioMedicine;120

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105905

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)