Phase III Trial of PROSTVAC in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Gulley JL] National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. [Borre M] Aarhus Universitetshospital, Åarhus, Denmark. [Vogelzang NJ] Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV. [Ng S] St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia. [Agarwal N] University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT. [Carles J] Genitourinary, CNS and Sarcoma Tumors Program, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain. Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-03-11T14:25:03Z

2021-03-11T14:25:03Z

2019-05-01



Abstract

Càncer de pròstata; Metàstasi neoplàsica; Immunoteràpia


Cáncer de próstata; Metástasis neoplásica; Inmunoterapia


Prostate cancer; Metastatic neoplasm; Immunotherapy


PURPOSE PROSTVAC, a viral vector–based immunotherapy, prolonged median overall survival (OS) by 8.5 months versus placebo in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a phase II study. This phase III study further investigated those findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to PROSTVAC (Arm V; n = 432), PROSTVAC plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Arm VG; n = 432), or placebo (Arm P; n = 433), stratified by prostate-specific antigen (less than 50 ng/mL v 50 ng/mL or more) and lactate dehydrogenase (less than 200 v 200 U/L or more). Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were patients alive without events (AWE)—namely, radiographic progression, pain progression, chemotherapy initiation, or death—at 6 months and safety. The study design was a superiority trial of PROSTVAC (Arm V or Arm VG) versus Arm P. Three interim analyses were planned. RESULTS At the third interim analysis, criteria for futility were met and the trial was stopped early. Neither active treatment had an effect on median OS (Arm V, 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20; P = .47; Arm VG, 33.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .59; Arm P, 34.3 months). Likewise, AWE at 6 months was similar (Arm V, 29.4%; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.29; Arm VG, 28.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.20; placebo, 30.3%). Adverse events were similar for the treatment and placebo groups, with the most common being injection site reactions (62% to 72%) and fatigue (21% to 24%). Arrhythmias were the most common cardiac-related events (1.4% to 3.5%). There were no reports of either myocarditis or pericarditis. Serious treatment-related events occurred in less than 1% of all patients. CONCLUSION Whereas PROSTVAC was safe and well tolerated, it had no effect on OS or AWE in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Combination therapy is currently being explored in clinical trials.


Supported by Bavarian Nordic, the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, and the Institute of Cancer Research. Funded in part by National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant No. P30-CA008748 and the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute.


P30 CA008748/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology

Related items

Journal of Clinical Oncology;37(13)

https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.18.02031

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)