Biomarker analysis beyond angiogenesis: RAS/RAF mutation status, tumour sidedness, and second-line ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma from RAISE-a global phase III study

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Yoshino T] National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan. [Portnoy DC] The West Clinic, Memphis, USA. [Obermannová R] Masarykuv Onkologicky Ustav, Brno, Czech Republic. [Bodoky G] St. Laszlo Hospital, Budapest, Hungary. [Prausová J] Fakultni Nemocnice v MOTOLE, Prague, Czech Republic. [Garcia-Carbonero R] Hospital Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, IIS imas12, UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain. [Tabernero J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-03-19T12:39:55Z

2021-03-19T12:39:55Z

2018

2019-01-01



Abstract

Carcinoma colorrectal; Ramucirumab; BRAF


Carcinoma colorrectal; Ramucirumab; BRAF


Colorectal carcinoma; Ramucirumab; BRAF


Background Second-line treatment with ramucirumab+FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo+FOLFIRI for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.84, 95% CI 0.73–0.98, P = 0.022]. Post hoc analyses of RAISE patient data examined the association of RAS/RAF mutation status and the anatomical location of the primary CRC tumour (left versus right) with efficacy parameters. Patients and methods Patient tumour tissue was classified as BRAF mutant, KRAS/NRAS (RAS) mutant, or RAS/BRAF wild-type. Left-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum; right-CRC included transverse, ascending colon, and cecum. Results RAS/RAF mutation status was available for 85% of patients (912/1072) and primary tumour location was known for 94.4% of patients (1012/1072). A favourable and comparable ramucirumab treatment effect was observed for patients with RAS mutations (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.04) and patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.64–1.14). Among the 41 patients with BRAF-mutated tumours, the ramucirumab benefit was more notable (OS HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.25–1.13), although, as with the other genetic sub-group analyses, differences were not statistically significant. Progression-free survival (PFS) data followed the same trend. Treatment-by-mutation status interaction tests (OS P = 0.523, PFS P = 0.655) indicated that the ramucirumab benefit was not statistically different among the mutation sub-groups, although the small sample size of the BRAF group limited the analysis. Addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved left-CRC median OS by 2.5 month over placebo (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.97); median OS for ramucirumab-treated patients with right-CRC was 1.1 month over placebo (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.75–1.26). The treatment-by-sub-group interaction was not statistically significant for tumour sidedness (P = 0.276). Conclusions In the RAISE study, the addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes, regardless of RAS/RAF mutation status, and tumour sidedness. Ramucirumab treatment provided a numerically substantial benefit in BRAF-mutated tumours, although the P-values were not statistically significant.


This work was supported by Eli Lilly and Company. No grant number is applicable.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Related items

Annals of Oncology;30

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419309792

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)