Health-related quality of life associated with trifluridine/tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: results from TAGS

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Tabernero J, Alsina M] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. UVic-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain. [Shitara K, Doi T] National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan. [Dvorkin M] Omsk Regional Clinical Centre of Oncology, Omsk, Russia. [Mansoor W] The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-09-20T09:33:47Z

2021-09-20T09:33:47Z

2020-07

Abstract

Càncer gàstric; Qualitat de vida relacionada amb la salut; Trifluridina/tipiracil


Gastric cancer; Health-related quality of life; Trifluridine/tipiracil


Cáncer gástrico; Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud; Trifluridina/tipiracilo


Background In TAGS, an international, double-blind, phase 3 trial, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with placebo in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer patients. This paper reports pre-specified quality of life (QoL) outcomes for TAGS. Methods Patients were randomized 2:1 to trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle) plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. QoL was evaluated at baseline and at each treatment cycle, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaires; results were considered valid for analysis only if ≥ 10% of patients completed the questionnaires. Key QoL outcomes were mean changes from baseline and time to deterioration in QoL. A post hoc analysis assessed the association between QoL and time to deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) to ≥ 2. Results Of 507 randomized patients, 496 had baseline QoL data available. The analysis cut-off was 6 cycles for trifluridine/tipiracil and 3 cycles for placebo. In both treatment groups, there were no clinically significant deteriorations in the mean QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (GHS) score, or in most subscale scores. In a sensitivity analysis including death and disease progression as events, there was a trend towards trifluridine/tipiracil reducing the risk of deterioration of QoL scores compared with placebo. Deterioration in the GHS score was associated with deterioration in ECOG PS.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Gastric Cancer;23

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01053-9

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)