Statin and metformin use and outcomes in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide: A meta-analysis of AFFIRM, PREVAIL and PROSPER

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Joshua AM, Crumbaker M] Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. [Armstrong A] Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. [Scher HI] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. [de Bono J] The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Tombal B] Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. [Carles J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-05-18T07:13:06Z

2023-05-18T07:13:06Z

2022-07

Abstract

Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Metformin; Overall survival


Càncer de pròstata resistent a la castració; Metformina; Supervivència global


Cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración; Metformina; Supervivencia global


Background: Statins and metformin are commonly prescribed for patients, including those with prostate cancer. Preclinical and epidemiologic studies of each agent have suggested anti-cancer properties. Methods: Patient data from three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies evaluating enzalutamide (AFFIRM, PREVAIL and PROSPER) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer were included in this analysis. This post hoc, retrospective study examined the association of statin and metformin on radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for available clinical prognostic variables, multivariate analyses were performed on pooled data from AFFIRM and PREVAIL, all three trials pooled, and each trial individually, to assess differential efficacy in these end-points associated with the baseline use of these medications. Results: In the multivariate analysis of the individual trials, OS and rPFS/MFS were not significantly influenced by statin or metformin use in AFFIRM or PROSPER. However, in PREVAIL, OS was significantly influenced by statin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.89) and rPFS was significantly influenced by metformin (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.34-0.70). In pooled analyses, improved OS was significantly associated with statin use but not metformin use for AFFIRM+PREVAIL trials (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.96) and AFFIRM+PREVAIL+PROSPER (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85). Conclusions: The association between statin or metformin use and rPFS, MFS and OS was inconsistent across three trials. Analyses of all three trials pooled and AFFIRM+PREVAIL pooled revealed that statin but not metformin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death in enzalutamide-treated patients. Additional prospective, controlled studies are warranted.


This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY, USA) and Astellas Pharma, Inc. (Northbrook, IL, USA), the co-developers of enzalutamide. Medical writing and editorial support funded by the sponsors were provided by Stephanie Vadasz, PhD, and Dena McWain of Ashfield MedComms (an Ashfield Health company), Lauren Rainer, BSc, and Julie B. Stimmel, PhD, of Onyx (a Prime Global agency).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

European Journal of Cancer;170

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.005

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)