Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Ciències de la Computació
2016
(c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.
In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3. We compare the performance for two architectures considering transmission rate and OLSR protocol. The simulation results show that for transmission rate 600 and 1200 [kbps], the throughput of Hybrid WMN is higher than I/B WMN. For transmission rate 600 and 1200 [kbps], the delay and jitter of Hybrid WMN is lower than I/B WMN. For transmission rate 600 and 1200 [kbps], the fairness index of I/B WMN is higher than Hybrid WMN.
Peer Reviewed
Postprint (author's final draft)
Conference report
Inglés
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Telemàtica i xarxes d'ordinadors; Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica; Wireless communication systems; Computer algorithms; Computer network protocols; Transmission rate; Genetic algorithms; Wireless Mesh Networks; NS-3; Network architecture; OLSR; DCF; SGC; NCMC; Normal distribution; Comunicació sense fil, Sistemes de; Algorismes genètics; Protocols de xarxes d'ordinadors
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7789735/
Open Access
E-prints [73020]
