dc.contributor.author
Mallorquí-Bagué, Núria
dc.contributor.author
Fagundo, Ana Beatriz
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez-Murcia, Susana
dc.contributor.author
Torre Fornell, Rafael de la
dc.contributor.author
Baños Rivera, Rosa María
dc.contributor.author
Botella Arbona, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Casanueva, Felipe F.
dc.contributor.author
Crujeiras, Ana B.
dc.contributor.author
Fernández García, José C.
dc.contributor.author
Fernández-Real Lemos, José Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Frühbeck, Gema
dc.contributor.author
Granero, Roser
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez, Amaia
dc.contributor.author
Tolosa-Sola, Iris
dc.contributor.author
Ortega González, Fco. Javier
dc.contributor.author
Tinahones, Francisco J.
dc.contributor.author
Alvarez-Moya, Eva
dc.contributor.author
Ochoa Arnedo, Cristian
dc.contributor.author
Menchón Magriñá, José Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Aranda, Fernando
dc.date.issued
2017-05-02T07:12:19Z
dc.date.issued
2017-05-02T07:12:19Z
dc.date.issued
2016-09-30
dc.date.issued
2017-05-02T07:12:19Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/110283
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: Addictions are associated with decision making impairments. The present study explores decision making in Substance use disorder (SUD), Gambling disorder (GD) and Obesity (OB) when assessed by Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and compares them with healthy controls (HC). Methods: For the aims of this study, 591 participants (194 HC, 178 GD, 113 OB, 106 SUD) were assessed according to DSM criteria, completed a sociodemographic interview and conducted the IGT. Results: SUD, GD and OB present impaired decision making when compared to the HC in the overall task and task learning, however no differences are found for the overall performance in the IGT among the clinical groups. Results also reveal some specific learning across the task patterns within the clinical groups: OB maintains negative scores until the third set where learning starts but with a less extend to HC, SUD presents an early learning followed by a progressive although slow improvement and GD presents more random choices with no learning. Conclusions: Decision making impairments are present in the studied clinical samples and they display individual differences in the task learning. Results can help understanding the underlying mechanisms of OB and addiction behaviors as well as improve current clinical treatments.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163901
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, num. 9, p. e0163901
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163901
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Mallorquí-Bagué, N. et al., 2016
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject
Presa de decisions
dc.subject
Condició física
dc.subject
Abús de substàncies
dc.subject
Psicopatologia
dc.subject
Neuropsicologia
dc.subject
Decision making
dc.subject
Physical fitness
dc.subject
Compulsive gambling
dc.subject
Substance abuse
dc.subject
Pathological psychology
dc.subject
Neuropsychology
dc.title
Decision making impairment: A shared vulnerability in obesity, gambling disorder and substance use disorders?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion