dc.contributor.author
Jiménez-Alfaro, Borja
dc.contributor.author
Suárez-Seoane, Susana
dc.contributor.author
Chytrý, Milan
dc.contributor.author
Hennekens, Stephan.M.
dc.contributor.author
Willner, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.author
Hájek, Michal
dc.contributor.author
Agrillo, Emiliano
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez-Martínez, Jose M.
dc.contributor.author
Bergamini, Ariel
dc.contributor.author
Brisse, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Brunet, Jörg
dc.contributor.author
Casella, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Díte, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Font i Castell, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Gillet, François
dc.contributor.author
Hajkova, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Jansen, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Jandt, Ute
dc.contributor.author
Kacki, ZZygmunt
dc.contributor.author
Lenoir, Jnoathan
dc.contributor.author
Rodwell, John S.
dc.contributor.author
Schaminée, Joop H. J.
dc.contributor.author
Sekulová, Lucia
dc.contributor.author
Sibík, Jozef
dc.contributor.author
Skvorc, Zeljko
dc.contributor.author
Tsiripidis, IIoannis
dc.date.issued
2019-05-16T14:29:04Z
dc.date.issued
2019-05-16T14:29:04Z
dc.date.issued
2019-05-16T14:29:04Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/133323
dc.description.abstract
Aim We investigate whether (1) environmental predictors allow to delineate the distribution of discrete community types at the continental scale and (2) how data completeness influences model generalization in relation to the compositional variation of the modelled entities. Location Europe. Methods We used comprehensive datasets of two community types of conservation concern in Europe: acidophilous beech forests and base‐rich fens. We computed community distribution models (CDMs) calibrated with environmental predictors to predict the occurrence of both community types, evaluating geographical transferability, interpolation and extrapolation under different scenarios of sampling bias. We used generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) to assess the role of geographical and environmental drivers in compositional variation within the predicted distributions. Results For the two community types, CDMs computed for the whole study area provided good performance when evaluated by random cross‐validation and external validation. Geographical transferability provided lower but relatively good performance, while model extrapolation performed poorly when compared with interpolation. Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed a predominant effect of geographical distance on compositional variation, complemented with the environmental predictors that also influenced habitat suitability. Main conclusions Correlative approaches typically used for modelling the distribution of individual species are also useful for delineating the potential area of occupancy of community types at the continental scale, when using consistent definitions of the modelled entity and high data completeness. The combination of CDMs with GDM further improves the understanding of diversity patterns of plant communities, providing spatially explicit information for mapping vegetation diversity and related habitat types at large scales.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
John Wiley & Sons
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12736
dc.relation
Diversity and Distributions, 2018, vol. 24, num. 7, p. 978-990
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12736
dc.rights
(c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject
Varietats de plantes
dc.subject
Plant varieties
dc.title
Modelling the distribution and compositional variation of plant communities at the continental scale
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion