Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009

Publication date

2020-04-22T10:06:21Z

2020-04-22T10:06:21Z

2010-02-01

2020-04-22T10:06:21Z

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.7

Croatian Medical Journal, 2010, vol. 51, num. 1, p. 7-15

https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.7

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

cc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es

This item appears in the following Collection(s)