2021-02-19T10:25:27Z
2021-02-19T10:25:27Z
2018-07
2021-02-19T10:25:27Z
The objective of this study was to assess the validity of two questions about the perception of intensity of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at home using as a reference environmental markers (airborne nicotine and benzene) and biomarkers of exposure (cotinine in saliva and urine). This was a cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of 49 non-smoking volunteers. We found a high correlation between self-reported SHS exposure and airborne nicotine (rsp=0.806, p<0.05), salivary cotinine (rsp=0.752, p<0.05), and urinary cotinine (rsp=0.626, p<0.05). We did not find differences between the score question and the conventional ones (p >0.05). In conclusion, the significant correlation of the two questions proposed with environmental markers and personal markers indicates their potential validity to assess exposure to SHS at home.
Article
Published version
English
Llar; Nicotina; Marcadors bioquímics; Home; Nicotine; Biochemical markers
Elsevier
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.08.002
Gaceta Sanitaria, 2018, vol. 32, num. 4, p. 393-395
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.08.002
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/681040/EU//TackSHS
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS), 2018
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es