dc.contributor.author
Resina, Elena
dc.contributor.author
Donday, María G.
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Domínguez, Samuel J.
dc.contributor.author
Laserna Mendieta, Emilio José
dc.contributor.author
Lanas, Ángel
dc.contributor.author
Lucendo, Alfredo J.
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez Luengo, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Alcaide, Noelia
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Salazar, Luis
dc.contributor.author
De La Peña Negro, Luisa
dc.contributor.author
Bujanda, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Arbulo, Marta Gómez Ruiz De
dc.contributor.author
Alcedo, Javier
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Aisa, Ángeles
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez, Raúl
dc.contributor.author
Hermida, Sandra
dc.contributor.author
Brenes, Yanire
dc.contributor.author
Nyssen, Olga P.
dc.contributor.author
Gisbert, Javier P.
dc.date.issued
2022-10-03T09:57:37Z
dc.date.issued
2022-10-03T09:57:37Z
dc.date.issued
2022-08-29
dc.date.issued
2022-09-29T10:22:47Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/189565
dc.description.abstract
The stool antigen test (SAT) represents an attractive alternative for detection of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a new SAT, the automated LIAISON(R) Meridian H. pylori SA based on monoclonal antibodies, compared to the defined gold standard C-13-urea breath test (UBT). This prospective multicentre study (nine Spanish centres) enrolled patients >= 18 years of age with clinical indication to perform UBT for the initial diagnosis and for confirmation of bacterial eradication. Two UBT methods were used: mass spectrometry (MS) including citric acid (CA) or infrared spectrophotometry (IRS) without CA. Overall, 307 patients (145 naive, 162 with confirmation of eradication) were analysed. Using recommended cut-off values (negative SAT < 0.90, positive >= 1.10) the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 67%, 97%, 86%, 92% and 91%, respectively, obtaining an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.85. Twenty-eight patients, including seven false positives and 21 false negatives, presented a discordant result between SAT and UBT. Among the 21 false negatives, four of six tested with MS and 11 of 15 tested with IRS presented a borderline UBT delta value. In 25 discordant samples, PCR targeting H. pylori DNA was performed to re-assess positivity and SAT accuracy was re-analysed: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and AUC were 94%, 97%, 86%, 99%, 97% and 0.96, respectively. The new LIAISON(R) Meridian H. pylori SA SAT showed a good accuracy for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175077
dc.relation
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, vol. 11, num. 17, p. 5077
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175077
dc.rights
cc by (c) Resina, Elena et al., 2022
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject
Helicobacter pylori
dc.subject
Helicobacter pylori
dc.title
Evaluation of a New Monoclonal Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Stool Antigen Test for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Spanish Multicentre Study
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion