dc.contributor.author
Polette, Daniela
dc.contributor.author
Busquets Barenys, Juli
dc.contributor.author
Secanella Medayo, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Sorribas Grifell, María
dc.contributor.author
Peláez Serra, Nuria
dc.contributor.author
Uribe, Catalina
dc.contributor.author
Martinez-Carnicero, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Salord, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Guerrero Pérez, Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Vercher Conejero, José Luís
dc.contributor.author
Teulé Vega, Àlex
dc.contributor.author
Fabregat Prous, Joan
dc.date.issued
2024-08-29T11:13:25Z
dc.date.issued
2024-08-29T11:13:25Z
dc.date.issued
2024-08-29T11:13:30Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/214862
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: the diagnosis of asymptomatic sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) has increased significantly due to the widespread use of high-resolution imaging tests, which is why the most appropriate management at the time of diagnosis is the subject of debate, as is how to follow-up patients. Aims: the objective of this study was to analyze the frequency of imaging and endoscopic studies performed during long-term follow-up. Methods: a retrospective review was performed of a database collected between January 2008 and December 2020 of patients with an incidental diagnosis of small NF-PNETs; follow-up was closed in March 2023. The imaging tests performed at the time of diagnosis and long-term follow-up were recorded. Growing less than 1 mm per year has not been considered as a worrisome feature. Follow-up was performed through imaging tests, considering endoscopic cytology for lesions with a faster grow rate. Results: fifty-eight patients were included; the median age was 69 years. The initial mean size of the lesions studied was 12.79 mm (5-27). Follow-up was carried out only with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial size did not influence the behavior of the lesion in a statistically significant manner. Twenty-eight tumors (45 %) increased in size, with a growth equal to or less than 4 mm in 24 cases. The mean follow-up time was 82.41 months (12-164). No patient developed metastasis or died from PNET progression. Conclusions: the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors of small size can be performed safely with only imaging tests.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
ARÁN EDICIONES, S.L.
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2023.9293/2022
dc.relation
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2024, vol. 116, num.4, p. 209-215
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2023.9293/2022
dc.rights
(c) ARÁN EDICIONES, S.L., 2024
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject
Càncer de pàncrees
dc.subject
Diagnòstic per la imatge
dc.subject
Pancreas cancer
dc.subject
Diagnostic imaging
dc.title
Is long-term follow-up solely by imaging tests safe in non-operated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion