Euclid preparation XXXVI. Modelling the weak lensing angular power spectrum

Author

Deshpande, A.C.

Kitching, T.

Hall, A.

Brown, M.L.

Aghanim, N.

Amendola, L.

Andreon, S.

Auricchio, N.

Baldi, M.

Bardelli, S.

Bender, R.

Morgante, G.

Nadathur, S.

Nucita, A.A.

Patrizii, L.

Peel, A.

Pöntinen, M.

Popa, V.

Porciani, C.

Potter, D.

Cardone, V.F.

Saglia, R.

Pourtsidou, A.

Reimberg, P.

Sakr, Z.

Sánchez, A.G.

Schneider, A.

Sefusatti, E.

Sereno, M.

Shulevski, A.

Spurio Mancini, A.

Steinwagner, J.

Sapone, D.

Carretero, J.

Teyssier, R.

Viel, M.

Zinchenko, I.A.

Fleury, P.

Casas, S.

Castander, F.J.

Castellano, M.

Cavuoti, S.

Cimatti, A.

Sartoris, B.

Cledassou, R.

Congedo, G.

Conselice, C.J.

Conversi, L.

Corcione, L.

Courbin, Frédéric

Courtois, H.M.

Cropper, M.

Da Silva, A.

Degaudenzi, H.

Schneider, P.

Douspis, M.

Dubath, F.

Duncan, C.A.J.

Dupac, X.

Farina, M.

Farrens, S.

Ferriol, S.

Fosalba, Pablo

Frailis, M.

Franceschi, E.

Schrabback, T.

Fumana, M.

Galeotta, S.

Garilli, B.

Gillis, B.

Giocoli, C.

Grazian, A.

Grupp, F.

Haugan, S.V.H.

Hoekstra, H.

Holmes, W.

Secroun, A.

Hornstrup, A.

Hudelot, P.

Jahnke, K.

Keihänen, E.

Kermiche, S.

Kilbinger, M.

Kunz, M.

Kurki-Suonio, H.

Ligori, S.

Lilje, P.B.

Seidel, G.

Lindholm, V.

Lloro, I.

Maiorano, E.

Mansutti, O.

Marggraf, O.

Markovic, K.

Martinet, N.

Marulli, F.

Massey, R.

Mei, S.

Serrano, Susana

Mellier, Y.

Meneghetti, M.

Meylan, G.

Moscardini, L.

Niemi, S.-M.

Nightingale, J.W.

Nutma, T.

Padilla, C.

Paltani, S.

Pasian, F.

Sirignano, C.

Pedersen, K.

Pettorino, V.

Pires, S.

Polenta, G.

Pollack, J.

Poncet, M.

Popa, L.A.

Raison, F.

Renzi, A.

Rhodes, J.

Sirri, G.

Riccio, G.

Romelli, E.

Roncarelli, M.

Rossetti, E.

Euclid Collaboration

Bonino, D.

Stanco, L.

Tallada-Crespí, P.

Taylor, A.N.

Tereno, I.

Toledo-Moreo, R.

Torradeflot, F.

Tutusaus, I.

Valentijn, E.A.

Valenziano, L.

Vassallo, T.

Branchini, E.

Wang, Yan

Weller, J.

Zacchei, A.

Zamorani, G.

Zoubian, J.

Zucca, E.

Boucaud, A.

Bozzo, E.

Colodro-Conde, C.

Di Ferdinando, D.

Brescia, M.

Fabbian, G.

Graciá-Carpio, J.

Mauri, Nuria

Scottez, V.

Tenti, M.

Akrami, Y.

Baccigalupi, C.

Balaguera-Antolínez, A.

Ballardini, M.

Bernardeau, F.

Brinchmann, J.

Biviano, A.

Blanchard, A.

Borlaff, A.S.

Burigana, C.

Cabanac, R.

Cappi, A.

Carvalho, C.S.

Castignani, G.

Castro, T.

Chambers, K.C.

Camera, S.

Cooray, A.R.

Coupon, J.

Davini, S.

De La Torre, S.

De Lucia, G.

Desprez, G.

Dole, H.

Escartin, J.A.

Escoffier, S.

Ferrero, I.

Candini, G.P.

Finelli, F.

Garcia-Bellido, J.

George, K.

Giacomini, F.

Gozaliasl, G.

Hildebrandt, H.

Kajava, J.J.E.

Kansal, V.

Kirkpatrick, C.C.

Legrand, L.

Capobianco, V.

Loureiro, Ana

MacIas-Perez, J.

Magliocchetti, M.

Mainetti, G.

Maoli, R.

Martinelli, M.

Martins, C.J.A.P.

Matthew, S.

Maurin, L.

Metcalf, R.B.

Carbone, C.

Monaco, P.

Publication date

2025-05-13T16:14:48Z

2025-05-13T16:14:48Z

2024

2025-05-13T16:14:48Z

Abstract

This work considers which higher order modeling effects on the cosmic shear angular power spectra must be taken into account for Euclid. We identified the relevant terms and quantified their individual and cumulative impact on the cosmological parameter inferences from Euclid. We computed the values of these higher order effects using analytic expressions and calculated the impact on cosmological parameter estimations using the Fisher matrix formalism. We reviewed 24 effects and determined the ones that potentially need to be accounted for, namely: the reduced shear approximation, magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, local Universe effects, and the flat Universe assumption. After computing these effects explicitly and calculating their cosmological parameter biases, using a maximum multipole of ` = 5000, we find that the magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, and local Universe terms individually produce significant (>0.25σ) cosmological biases in one or more parameters; accordingly, these effects must be accounted for and warrant further investigation. In total, we find biases in Ωm, Ωb, h, and σ8 of 0.73σ, 0.28σ, 0.25σ, and −0.79σ, respectively, for the flat ΛCDM. For the w0waCDM case, we found biases in Ωm, Ωb, h, ns , σ8, and wa of 1.49σ, 0.35σ, −1.36σ, 1.31σ, −0.84σ, and −0.35σ, respectively. These are increased relative to the ΛCDM due to additional degeneracies as a function of redshift and scale.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346110

Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2024, vol. 684, num.A138

https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346110

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

(c) The European Southern Observatory (ESO), 2024

This item appears in the following Collection(s)