Measurement of melanocytic choroidal lesions: ultrasound versus ultrawide-field fundus imaging system

dc.contributor.author
Arias, Lluis
dc.contributor.author
Baradad Jurjo, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Lorenzo Parra, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Rojas-Pineda, Estel·la
dc.contributor.author
Vigués Jorba, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Morwani, Rahul
dc.contributor.author
García Bru, Pere
dc.contributor.author
Cobos Martín, Estefanía
dc.contributor.author
Santamaría Álvarez, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez Fernández, Carmen Antía
dc.contributor.author
Caminal Mitjana, Josep Maria
dc.date.issued
2025-07-15T10:33:50Z
dc.date.issued
2025-07-15T10:33:50Z
dc.date.issued
2025-02-14
dc.date.issued
2025-07-15T10:33:50Z
dc.identifier
2072-6694
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/222256
dc.identifier
757601
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to establish the concordance between conventional 20 Mhz ultrasonography and an ultrawide-field (UWF) imaging system (Optos® California) in the measurement of basal diameters of melanocytic choroidal tumors. Methods: A retrospective study comparing diagnostic tests was conducted in patients with untreated melanocytic choroidal lesions (either nevus or melanoma) who had undergone both UWF imaging and ultrasonography. Only cases with a clear visualization of tumor borders in both imaging modalities were included. Longitudinal and transversal base diameters of the melanocytic tumors were measured by 20 MHz US (one observer) and UWF fundus photography (two observers). Interobserver agreement was assessed for UWF imaging first to validate the technique. Then, UWF imaging measurements were compared with 20 MHz US results. Results: In total, 106 patient images were reviewed, of which 61 were excluded due to unclear visualization of tumor margins. We found excellent concordance (from ICC and defined Bland–Altman plots) for interobserver and inter-technique agreement in estimating basal diameters when using pseudocolor composite and red laser images by comparing them with 20 MHz US results. Conclusions: UWF fundus imaging, when complete visualization of the tumor margins is possible, could be as reliable as ultrasonography in the measurement of the basal diameters of choroidal melanocytic tumors.
dc.format
11 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
MDPI
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040642
dc.relation
Cancers, 2025, vol. 17, num.4
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040642
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Baradad-Jurjo, M.C. et al., 2025
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject
Tumors
dc.subject
Diagnòstic per la imatge
dc.subject
Ecografia
dc.subject
Tumors
dc.subject
Diagnostic imaging
dc.subject
Ultrasonic imaging
dc.title
Measurement of melanocytic choroidal lesions: ultrasound versus ultrawide-field fundus imaging system
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)