2017-09-26T12:26:26Z
2017-09-26T12:26:26Z
2016
The goal of this short paper is to show that esthetic adjectives—exemplified by “beautiful” and “elegant”—do not pattern stably on a range of linguistic diagnostics that have been used to taxonomize the gradability properties of adjectives. We argue that a plausible explanation for this puzzling data involves distinguishing two properties of gradable adjectives that have been frequently conflated: whether an adjective’s applicability is sensitive to a comparison class, and whether an adjective’s applicability is context-dependent.
Shen-yi Liao’s work was supported by a European Community FP7 Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship, grant PIIF-GA-2012-328977. Louise McNally’s work was supported by Spanish MINECO grant FFI2013-41301-P, AGAUR grant 2014SGR698, and an ICREA Academia award.
Article
Versió acceptada
Anglès
Aesthetic adjectives; Aesthetic concepts; Gradable adjectives; Predicates of personal taste; Experimental semantics; Experimental philosophy; Experimental philosophical aesthetics; Context; Comparison class
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Inquiry. 2016; 59(6):618-31. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208927
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2013-41301-P
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/328977
© Taylor & Francis. This is an electronic version of an article published in Liao S, McNally L, Meskin A. Aesthetic adjectives lack uniform behavior. Inquiry. 2016; 59(6):618-31. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208927. Inquiry is available online at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208927