Capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Author

Feliu, Jaime

Safont, M. J.

Salud Salvia, Maria Antonieta

Losa, F.

García-Girón, C.

Bosch, Carlos

Escudero, P.

López, R.

Madroñal, C.

Bolaños, M.

Gil, M.

Llombart, A.

Castro-Carpeño, J.

González-Barón, M.

Publication date

2015-07-09T10:39:46Z

2025-01-01

2010



Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of capecitabine and bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) considered unsuitable for receiving first-line chemotherapy with an irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based combination were assessed in a phase II, open, multicentre, uncontrolled study. METHODS: Treatment consisted of capecitabine 1250 mgm 2 (or 950 mgm 2 for patients with a creatinine clearance of 30–50ml min 1) twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab (7.5 mg kg 1) on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients aged X70 years with mCRC were enrolled. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 34%, with 71% of patients achieving disease control. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.8 months and 18 months, respectively. In all, 32 patients (54%) had grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), the most common being hand–foot syndrome (19%), diarrhoea (9%) and deep venous thrombosis (7%). Four patients died because of treatment-related AEs. A relationship was detected between creatinine clearance p50 ml min 1 and the development of non-bevacizumab-related grade 3/4 AEs. The incidence of bevacizumab-associated AEs (hypertension, thromboembolic events and proteinuria) was consistent with that of previous reports in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with capecitabine represents a valid therapeutic alternative in elderly patients considered to be unsuitable for receiving polychemotherapy.

Document Type

article
publishedVersion

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

capecitabine; bevacizumab; colorectal neoplasms

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Cancer Research UK

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605663

British Journal of Cancer, 2010, vol. 102, p. 1468-1473

Rights

(c) Cancer Research UK, 2010

(c) Nature Publishing Group, 2010

This item appears in the following Collection(s)