An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems

Autor/a

Veres, Andrea

Wyckhuys, Kris A. G.

Kiss, Jozsef

Tóth, Ferenc

Burgio, Giovanni

Pons i Domènech, Xavier

Avilla, Carlos

Vidal, Stefan

Razinger, Jaka

Bazok, Renata

Matyjaszczyk, Ewa

Milosavljević, Ivan

Vi Le, Xuan

Zhou, Wenwu

Zhu, Zeng-Rong

Tarno, Hagus

Hadi, Buyung

Lundgren, Jonathan

Bonmatin, Jean-Marc

Bijleveld van Lexmond, Maarten

Aebi, Alexandre

Rauf, Aunu

Furlan, Lorenzo

Fecha de publicación

2020-11-09T09:57:59Z

2020-11-09T09:57:59Z

2020-06-04



Resumen

We present a synthetic review and expert consultation that assesses the actual risks posed by arthropod pests in four major crops, identifies targets for integrated pest management (IPM) in terms of cultivated land needing pest control and gauges the implementation “readiness” of non-chemical alternatives. Our assessment focuses on the world’s primary target pests for neonicotinoid-based management: western corn rootworm (WCR, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) in maize; wireworms (Agriotes spp.) in maize and winter wheat; bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) in winter wheat; brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens) in rice; cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) and silver-leaf whitefly (SLW, Bemisia tabaci) in cotton. First, we queried scientific literature databases and consulted experts from different countries in Europe, North America, and Asia about available IPM tools for each crop-pest system. Next, using an online survey, we quantitatively assessed the economic relevance of target pests by compiling country-level records of crop damage, yield impacts, extent of insecticide usage, and “readiness” status of various pest management alternatives (i.e., research, plot-scale validation, grower-uptake). Biological control received considerable scientific attention, while agronomic strategies (e.g., crop rotation), insurance schemes, decision support systems (DSS), and innovative pesticide application modes were listed as key alternatives. Our study identifies opportunities to advance applied research, IPM technology validation, and grower education to halt or drastically reduce our over-reliance on systemic insecticides globally.


he authors would like to thank the Stichting Triodos Foundation (The Netherlands) for funding the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) as a totally independent research group, for making this study and the relative open access possible. The Stichting Triodos Foundation received funds from the Umwelt Stiftung Greenpeace (Germany), Pollinis (France) and the M.A.O.C. Gravin van Bylandt Stichting (The Netherlands).

Tipo de documento

Artículo
Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Materias y palabras clave

Neonicotinoids; Soil pests; Aphids; Whitefly; Brown planthopper; Agricultural policy; Biological control

Publicado por

Springer

Documentos relacionados

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, vol. 27, p. 29867-29899

Derechos

cc-by (c) Veres, Andrea et al., 2020

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)