4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Bissell MM] Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), LIGHT Laboratories, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK. [Raimondi F] Children’s Hospital Meyer, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. [Ait Ali L] Institute of Clinical Physiology CNR, Massa, Italy. Foundation CNR Tuscany Region G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy. [Allen BD] Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. [Barker AJ] Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, USA. [Bolger A] Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. [Rodriguez-Palomares J] Servei de Cardiologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2023-08-23T07:46:17Z

2023-08-23T07:46:17Z

2023-07-20

Resumen

4D Flow MRI; Hemodynamics; Recommendations


Ressonància magnètica de flux 4D; Hemodinàmica; Recomanacions


Resonancia magnética de flujo 4D; Hemodinámica; Recomendaciones


Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 ‘4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement’. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.


1R01HL149787-01A1 (S. Schnell, M. Markl), 1R21NS122511-01 (S. Schnell), 1R01CA233878-01 (J.Collins) J.Sotelo thanks to ANID–Millennium Science Initiative Program–ICN2021_004 and FONDECYT de iniciación en investigación #11200481. Dr. Oechtering receives funding from the German Research Foundation (OE 746/1-1).

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

BMC

Documentos relacionados

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance;25

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)