SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (2018)

Author

Gonzalez-del-Alba, Aranzazu

De Velasco, G.

Lainez, N.

Maroto, P.

Morales Barrera, Rafael

Muñoz‑Langa, J.

Other authors

[González Del Alba A] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Joaquin Rodrigo 2, 28222 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. [De Velasco G] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. [Lainez N] Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. [Maroto P] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. [Morales-Barrera R] Genitourinary, CNS and Sarcoma Tumors Program, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Muñoz-Langa J] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-03-15T12:05:01Z

2021-03-15T12:05:01Z

2019-01



Abstract

Càncer de bufeta; Cistectomia; Quimioteràpia


Cáncer de vejiga; Cistectomía; Quimioterapia


Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Chemotherapy


The goal of this article is to provide recommendations about the management of muscle-invasive (MIBC) and metastatic bladder cancer. New molecular subtypes of MIBC are associated with specific clinical–pathological characteristics. Radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection are the gold standard for treatment and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a cisplatin-based combination should be recommended in fit patients. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in MIBC remains controversial; its use must be considered in patients with high-risk who are able to tolerate a cisplatin-based regimen, and have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Bladder-preserving approaches are reasonable alternatives to cystectomy in selected patients for whom cystectomy is not contemplated either for clinical or personal reasons. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the standard first-line protocol for metastatic disease. In the case of unfit patients, carboplatin–gemcitabine should be considered the preferred first-line chemotherapy treatment option, while pembrolizumab and atezolizumab can be contemplated for individuals with high PD-L1 expression. In cases of progression after platinum-based therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are standard alternatives. Vinflunine is another option when anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is not possible. There are no data from randomized clinical trials regarding moving on to immuno-oncology agents.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Bufeta - Càncer - Tractament; Metàstasi; DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Urogenital Neoplasms::Urologic Neoplasms::Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/therapy; DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplastic Processes::Neoplasm Metastasis; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias urogenitales::neoplasias urológicas::neoplasias de la vejiga; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/terapia; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::procesos neoplásicos::metástasis neoplásica

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Clinical and Translational Oncology;21

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12094-018-02001-x

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)