Knowledge and use of biosimilars in oncology: a survey by the European Society for Medical Oncology

Author

Giuliani, Rosa

Tabernero Caturla, Josep

Cardoso, Fatima

McGregor, Keith Hanson

Vyas, Malvika

de Vries, Elisabeth

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Giuliani R] Medical Oncology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy. [Tabernero J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Cardoso F] Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. [McGregor KH] Chief Executive Officer, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland. [Vyas M] Head of Public Policy, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland. [de Vries EGE] Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-03-16T09:42:14Z

2021-03-16T09:42:14Z

2019-03-06



Abstract

Biosimilars; Oncologia; Prescriptors


Biosimilares; Oncología; Prescriptores


Biosimilars; Oncology; Prescribers


Background: Biosimilars can potentially improve the sustainability of cancer care; however, uptake is sometimes limited by safety concerns and a lack of understanding of the concept of extrapolation. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) conducted a survey to assess the current level of knowledge, understanding and comfort of use of biosimilars among prescribers specialised in oncology. Methods: A 19-question survey was developed using the SurveyMonkey online platform (https://www.surveymonkey.com/). Data collection occurred between September and October 2017 and included paper and online responses. Results: Overall, 393 responses were received from prescribers. Overall, 49.0% of prescribers use biosimilars in clinical practice and most (79.2%) rate their general knowledge of biosimilars as average to very high. Potential increased risk of immunogenicity remains a significant concern of switching. Gaps in knowledge identified by the survey include biosimilar development, clinical trial design and endpoint selection, and requirements for extrapolation, which should form the focus of future educational initiatives. A substantial demand remains for further educational activities with equal preference for online and face-to-face initiatives. A higher rate of biosimilar use (56.3% vs 46.5%), knowledge of biosimilar development and trial design, and comfort with extrapolation, but a lower knowledge of European Medicines Agency definitions, was found among prescribers from Asia-Pacific versus those from Europe. Conclusion: Encouraging levels of prescriber use and general knowledge of biosimilars were found, but a substantial need for further education remains. Efforts should be made worldwide to align terms, definitions and guidelines for the development and approval of biosimilars.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Oncologia; Medicaments antineoplàstics; Càncer - Tractament; DISCIPLINES AND OCCUPATIONS::Health Occupations::Medicine::Internal Medicine::Medical Oncology; CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Complex Mixtures::Biological Products::Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; DISEASES::Neoplasms; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/therapy; DISCIPLINAS Y OCUPACIONES::profesiones sanitarias::medicina::medicina interna::oncología médica; COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::mezclas complejas::productos biológicos::fármacos biosimilares; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/terapia

Publisher

BMJ

Related items

ESMO Open;4(2)

https://www.esmoopen.com/article/S2059-7029(20)30171-X/fulltext

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)