Antitumor Efficacy of Dual Blockade with Encorafenib + Cetuximab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Human BRAFV600E-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Altres autors/es

Institut Català de la Salut

[Napolitano S, De Falco V, Martini G, Della Corte CM] Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli, Italy. [Woods M, Lee HM] Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. [Tabernero J] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Institute of Oncology, University of Vic/Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. Oncology Institute of Barcelona-Quironsalud, Biomedical Research Center in Cancer, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Data de publicació

2023-07-05T12:11:04Z

2023-07-05T12:11:04Z

2023-06-15

Resum

Antitumor efficacy; Chemotherapy; Colorectal cancer


Eficàcia antitumoral; Quimioteràpia; Càncer colorectal


Eficacia antitumoral; Quimioterapia; Cáncer colorrectal


Purpose: Encorafenib + cetuximab (E+C) is an effective therapeutic option in chemorefractory BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is a need to improve the efficacy of this molecular-targeted therapy and evaluate regimens suitable for untreated BRAFV600E in patients with mCRC. Experimental Design: We performed a series of in vivo studies using BRAFV600E mCRC tumor xenografts. Mice were randomized to receive 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), irinotecan, or oxaliplatin regimens (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX), (E+C) or the combination. Patients received long-term treatment until disease progression, with deescalation strategies used to mimic maintenance therapy. Transcriptomic changes after progression on cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy were assessed. Results: Antitumor activity of either FOLFIRI or E+C was better as first-line treatment as compared with second-line, with partial cross-resistance seen between a cytotoxic regimen and targeted therapy with an average 62% loss of efficacy for FOLFIRI after E+C and a 45% loss of efficacy of E+C after FOLFIRI (P < 0.001 for both). FOLFIRI-treated models had upregulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and MAPK pathway activation, where E+C treated models had suppressed MAPK signaling. In contrast, with chemotherapy with E+C, EMT and MAPK signaling remained suppressed. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, each in combination with E+C, were the most active first-line treatments as compared with E+C or to chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, FOLFOX in combination with E+C as first-line induction therapy, followed by E+C ± 5-FU as maintenance therapy, was the most effective strategy for long-term disease control. Conclusions: These results support the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy as a promising therapeutic approach in the first-line treatment of BRAFV600E mCRC.


A research grant that partially covered the costs of the study was provided by Regione Campania (I-Cure Research Project, grant number: Cup 21C17000030007, to F. Ciardiello and L. Altucci). This work was also supported by Cancer Center Support Grant – Gastrointestinal Program (Project Number: 5P30 CA016672–46). O.E. Villarreal was supported by the CPRIT Training Program (RP210028).

Tipus de document

Article


Versió publicada

Llengua

Anglès

Publicat per

American Association for Cancer Research

Documents relacionats

Clinical Cancer Research;29(12)

https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3894

Citació recomanada

Aquesta citació s'ha generat automàticament.

Drets

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)