Accelerometry of Seabream in a Sea-Cage: Is Acceleration a Good Proxy for Activity?

dc.contributor.author
Palstra, Arjan P.
dc.contributor.author
Arechavala-Lopez, Pablo
dc.contributor.author
Xue, Yuanxu
dc.contributor.author
Roque, Ana
dc.contributor.other
Producció Animal
dc.date.accessioned
2025-10-22T11:21:08Z
dc.date.available
2025-10-22T11:21:08Z
dc.date.issued
2021-02-22
dc.identifier.citation
Palstra, Arjan P., Pablo Arechavala-Lopez, Yuanxu Xue, and Ana Roque. 2021. "Accelerometry Of Seabream In A Sea-Cage: Is Acceleration A Good Proxy For Activity?". Frontiers In Marine Science 8. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.639608.
dc.identifier.issn
2296-7745
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1247
dc.description.abstract
Activity assessment of individual fish in a sea-cage could provide valuable insights into the behavior, but also physiological well-being and resilience, of the fish population in the cage. Acceleration can be monitored continuously with internal acoustic transmitter tags and is generally applied as a real-time proxy for activity. The objective of this study was to investigate the activity patterns of Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) by transmitter tags in a sea-cage and analyze correlations with water temperature, fish size and tissue weights. Experimental fish (N = 300) were transferred to an experimental sea-cage of which thirty fish (Standard Length SL = 18.3 ± 1.7 cm; Body Weight BW = 174 ± 39 g) were implanted with accelerometer tags. Accelerations were monitored for a period of 6 weeks (Nov.–Dec.) and were analyzed over the 6 weeks and 24 h of the day. At the end of the experimental period, tagged fish were again measured, weighed and dissected for tissue and filet weights, and correlations with accelerations were analyzed. Daily rhythms in accelerations under the experimental conditions were characterized by more active periods from 6 to 14 h and 18 to 0 h and less active periods from 0 to 6 h and 14 to 18 h. This W-shaped pattern remained over the experimental weeks, even with diurnal accelerations decreasing which was correlated to the dropping temperature. The increase in activity was not during, but just before feeding indicating food-anticipatory activity. Activity patterning can be useful for timing feeding events at the start of active periods, in this study between 6 and 11 h, and between 18 and 22 h. Acceleration was negatively correlated to heart and mesenteric fat mass, which was the exact contrary of our expectations for sustainedly swimming seabream. These results suggest that acceleration is a proxy for unsteady swimming activity only and research is required into the accelerations occurring during sustained swimming of seabream at various speeds.
dc.format.extent
7
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartof
Frontiers in Marine Science
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title
Accelerometry of Seabream in a Sea-Cage: Is Acceleration a Good Proxy for Activity?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.subject.udc
639
dc.description.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.embargo.terms
cap
dc.relation.projectID
EC/H2020/727315/EU/Mediterranean Aquaculture Integrated Development/MedAID
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.639608
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.contributor.group
Aqüicultura


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)