dc.contributor.author
Neuman Lorenzini , Rosario
dc.contributor.author
Grau, Sergi
dc.contributor.author
Belmonte, Miguel Ángel
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-05T08:56:45Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-05T08:56:45Z
dc.date.issued
2025-07-05
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2072/486622
dc.description.abstract
This article is divided into three parts. First, a brief exposition of the ontological foundations of ancient determinism is provided to explain the worldview held by such a philosophical position. The second part sets out the argument used by Chrysippus to make causal determinism compatible with moral responsibility, and points out the tensions that such a position entails. In the third part, the notion of freedom of ancient Stoicism is contrasted with the philosophy of Augustine in order to determine the novelty that Christianity represented in this matter.
en
dc.description.sponsorship
This research was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Proyectos de Generación de Conocimiento 2022 (Research Project “TOPOI: el repertorio de la paideia en la literatura griega de época imperial y tardoantigua”, PID2022-137964NB-I00).
ca
dc.relation.ispartof
Religions 2025, 16(7), 874
ca
dc.rights
© 2025 by the authors
ca
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
*
dc.source
RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.other
Estoïcisme
ca
dc.title
Fate and Freedom in Ancient Stoicism and Augustine’s Critique
en
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
en
dc.description.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ca
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070874
ca
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
