dc.contributor.author
Blum, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer
dc.contributor.author
Marghoob, Ashfaq A.
dc.contributor.author
Argenziano, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.author
Cabo, Horacio
dc.contributor.author
Carrera Álvarez, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Costa Soares de Sá, Bianca
dc.contributor.author
Ehrsam, Eric
dc.contributor.author
González, Roger
dc.contributor.author
Malvehy, J. (Josep)
dc.contributor.author
Manganoni, Ausilia Mara
dc.contributor.author
Puig i Sardà, Susana
dc.contributor.author
Simionescu, Olga
dc.contributor.author
Tanaka, Masaru
dc.contributor.author
Thomas, Luc
dc.contributor.author
Tromme, Isabelle
dc.contributor.author
Zalaudek, Iris
dc.contributor.author
Kittler, Harald J.
dc.date.issued
2018-02-21T11:23:43Z
dc.date.issued
2018-02-21T11:23:43Z
dc.date.issued
2017-01-13
dc.date.issued
2018-02-21T11:23:43Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/120093
dc.description.abstract
IMPORTANCE Differentiating recurrent nevi from recurrent melanoma is challenging. OBJECTIVE To determine dermoscopic features to differentiate recurrent nevi from melanomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective observational study of 15 pigmented lesion clinics from 12 countries; 98 recurrent nevi (61.3%) and 62 recurrent melanomas (38.8%) were collected from January to December 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Scoring the dermoscopic features, patterns, and colors in correlation with the histopathologic findings. RESULTS In univariate analysis, radial lines, symmetry, and centrifugal growth pattern were significantly more common dermoscopically in recurrent nevi; in contrast, circles, especially if on the head and neck area, eccentric hyperpigmentation at the periphery, a chaotic and noncontinuous growth pattern, and pigmentation beyond the scar's edge were significantly more common in recurrent melanomas. Patients with recurrent melanomas were significantly older than patients with recurrent nevi (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [17.5] years vs 30.2 [12.4] years) (P<.001), and there was a significantly longer time interval between the first procedure and the second treatment (median time interval, 25 vs 8 months) (P<.001). In a multivariate analysis, pigmentation beyond the scar's edge (P=.002), age (P<.001), and anatomic site (P=.002) were significantly and independently associated with the diagnosis of recurrent melanoma in dermoscopy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Dermoscopically, pigmentation beyond the scar's edge is the strongest clue for melanoma. Dermoscopy is helpful in evaluating recurrent lesions, but final interpretation requires taking into account the patient age, anatomic site, time to recurrence, growth pattern, and, if available, the histopathologic findings of the first excision.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
American Medical Association
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6908
dc.relation
JAMA Dermatology, 2017, vol. 150, num. 2, p. 138-145
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6908
dc.rights
(c) American Medical Association, 2017
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Microscòpia mèdica
dc.subject
Estudi de casos
dc.subject
Medical microscopy
dc.title
Recurrent melanocytic nevi and melanomas in dermoscopy: results of a multicenter study of the International Dermoscopy Society
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion