dc.contributor.author
Salvador, Raymond
dc.contributor.author
Radua, Joaquim
dc.contributor.author
Canales Rodríguez, Erick Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Sarró, Salvador
dc.contributor.author
Goikolea, José Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Valiente Gómez, Alicia
dc.contributor.author
Monté Rubio, Gemma C.
dc.contributor.author
Natividad, María del Carmen
dc.contributor.author
Guerrero Pedraza, Amalia
dc.contributor.author
Moro, Noemí
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Corcuera, Paloma
dc.contributor.author
Amann, Benedikt L.
dc.contributor.author
Maristany, Teresa
dc.contributor.author
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
dc.contributor.author
McKenna, Peter J.
dc.contributor.author
Pomarol-Clotet, Edith
dc.contributor.author
Solanes, Aleix
dc.date.issued
2018-03-15T12:50:34Z
dc.date.issued
2018-03-15T12:50:34Z
dc.date.issued
2017-04-20
dc.date.issued
2018-03-15T12:50:35Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/120770
dc.description.abstract
A relatively large number of studies have investigated the power of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls. However, very few of them have also included patients with bipolar disorder, allowing the clinically relevant discrimination between both psychotic diagnostics. To assess the efficacy of sMRI data for diagnostic prediction in psychosis we objectively evaluated the discriminative power of a wide range of commonly used machine learning algorithms (ridge, lasso, elastic net and L0 norm regularized logistic regressions, a support vector classifier, regularized discriminant analysis, random forests and a Gaussian process classifier) on main sMRI features including grey and white matter voxel-based morphometry (VBM), vertex-based cortical thickness and volume, region of interest volumetric measures and wavelet-based morphometry (WBM) maps. All possible combinations of algorithms and data features were considered in pairwise classifications of matched samples of healthy controls (N = 127), patients with schizophrenia (N = 128) and patients with bipolar disorder (N = 128). Results show that the selection of feature type is important, with grey matter VBM (without data reduction) delivering the best diagnostic prediction rates (averaging over classifiers: schizophrenia vs. healthy 75%, bipolar disorder vs. healthy 63% and schizophrenia vs. bipolar disorder 62%) whereas algorithms usually yielded very similar results. Indeed, those grey matter VBM accuracy rates were not even improved by combining all feature types in a single prediction model. Further multi-class classifications considering the three groups simultaneously made evident a lack of predictive power for the bipolar group, probably due to its intermediate anatomical features, located between those observed in healthy controls and those found in patients with schizophrenia. Finally, we provide MRIPredict (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mripredict/), a free tool for SPM, FSL and R, to easily carry out voxelwise predictions based on VBM images.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175683
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, num. 4, p. e0175683
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175683
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Salvador, Raymond et al., 2017
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Sistema nerviós central
dc.subject
Central nervous system
dc.title
Evaluation of machine learning algorithms and structural features for optimal MRI-based diagnostic prediction in psychosis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion