Clinical Features And Course Of Refractory Anemia With Ring Sideroblasts Associated With Marked Thrombocytosis

Author

Broseus, Julien

Florensa, Lourdes

Zipperer, Esther

Schnittger, Susanne

Malcovati, Luca

Richebourg, Steven

Lippert, Eric

Cermak, Jaroslav

Evans, Jyoti

Mounier, Morgane

Raya, José María

Bailly, François

Gattermann, Norbert

Haferlach, Torsten

Garand, Richard

Allou, Kaoutar

Besses, Carlos

Germing, Kaoutar

Haferlach, Claudia

Travaglino, Erica

Luño, Elisa

Pinan, Maria Angeles

Arenillas Rocha, Leonor

Rozman, María

Pérez Sirvent, Maria Luz

Favre, Bernardine

Guy, Julien

Alonso Sanz, Esther

Ahwij, Nuhri

Jerez, Andrés

Hermouet, Sylvie

Maynadié, Marc

Cazzola, Mario

Girodon, François

Publication date

2018-11-28T09:19:50Z

2018-11-28T09:19:50Z

2012-07

2018-07-24T12:54:07Z

Abstract

Background: Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis was proposed as a provisional entity in the 2001 World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and also in the 2008 version, but its existence as a single entity is contested. We wish to define the clinical features of this rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm and to compare its clinical outcome with that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and essential thrombocythemia. Design and Methods: We conducted a collaborative retrospective study across Europe. Our database included 200 patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis. For each of these patients, each patient diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts was matched for age and sex. At the same time, a cohort of 454 patients with essential thrombocythemia was used to compare outcomes of the two diseases. Results: In patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis, depending on the Janus Kinase 2 V617F mutational status (positive or negative) or platelet threshold (over or below 600x10(9)/L), no difference in survival was noted. However, these patients had shorter overall survival and leukemia-free survival with a lower risk of thrombotic complications than did patients with essential thrombocythemia (P<0.001) but better survival (P<0.001) and a higher risk of thrombosis (P=0.039) than patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. Conclusions: The clinical course of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis is better than that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and worse than that of essential thrombocythemia. The higher risk of thrombotic events in this disorder suggests that anti-platelet therapy might be considered in this subset of patients. From a clinical point of view, it appears to be important to consider refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis as a distinct entity.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Anèmia; Tumors; Anemia

Publisher

Ferrata Storti Foundation

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.053918

Haematologica, 2012, vol. 97, num. 7, p. 1036-1041

https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.053918

Rights

(c) Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2012