dc.contributor.author
Córdova, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Argüello, Lidia
dc.contributor.author
Loras Alastruey, Carme
dc.contributor.author
Naranjo Rodríguez, Antonio
dc.contributor.author
Riu Pons, Faust
dc.contributor.author
Gornals Soler, Joan B.
dc.contributor.author
Nicolás Pérez, David
dc.contributor.author
Andújar Murcia, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Hernández, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Santolaria, Santos
dc.contributor.author
Leal Valdivieso, Carles
dc.contributor.author
Pons Vilardell, Carles
dc.contributor.author
Pérez-Cuadrado Robles, Enrique
dc.contributor.author
García Bosch, Orlando
dc.contributor.author
Papo Berger, Michel
dc.contributor.author
Ulla Rocha, José L.
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez Montes, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Esparrach, Glòria
dc.date.issued
2019-01-23T11:25:06Z
dc.date.issued
2019-01-23T11:25:06Z
dc.date.issued
2017-12-21
dc.date.issued
2019-01-23T11:25:06Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/127549
dc.description.abstract
AIM: To evaluate the rate of adverse events (AEs) during consecutive gastric and duodenal polypectomies in several Spanish centers. METHODS: Polypectomies of protruded gastric or duodenal polyps ≥ 5 mm using hot snare were prospectively included. Prophylactic measures of hemorrhage were allowed in predefined cases. AEs were defined and graded according to the lexicon recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Patients were followed for 48 h, one week and 1 mo after the procedure. RESULTS: 308 patients were included and a single polypectomy was performed in 205. Only 36 (11.7%) were on prior anticoagulant therapy. Mean polyp size was 15 ± 8.9 mm (5-60) and in 294 cases (95.4%) were located in the stomach. Hemorrhage prophylaxis was performed in 219 (71.1%) patients. Nine patients presented AEs (2.9%), and 6 of them were bleeding (n = 6, 1.9%) (in 5 out of 6 AE, different types of endoscopic treatment were performed). Other 24 hemorrhagic episodes could be managed without any change in the outcome of the endoscopy and, consequently, were considered incidents. We did not find any independent risk factor of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Gastroduodenal polypectomy using prophylactic measures has a rate of AEs small enough to consider this procedure a safe and effective method for polyp resection independently of the polyp size and location.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Baishideng Publishing Group
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405
dc.relation
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, vol. 23, num. 47, p. 8405-8414
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405
dc.rights
cc-by-nc (c) Córdova, Henry et al., 2017
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Complicacions quirúrgiques
dc.subject
Pòlips (Patologia)
dc.subject
Complications of surgery
dc.subject
Polyps (Pathology)
dc.title
Rate of adverse events of gastroduodenal snare polypectomy for non-flat polyp is low: A prospective and multicenter study
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion