dc.contributor.author
Ferrando, Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Mellado Artigas, Ricard
dc.contributor.author
Gea, Alfredo
dc.contributor.author
Arruti, Egoitz
dc.contributor.author
Aldecoa, César
dc.contributor.author
Adalia, Ramón
dc.contributor.author
Ramasco, Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Monedero, Pablo
dc.contributor.author
Maseda, Emilio
dc.contributor.author
Tamayo, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.author
Hernández Sanz, María L.
dc.contributor.author
Mercadal, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Martín Grande, Ascensión
dc.contributor.author
Kacmarek, Robert M.
dc.contributor.author
Villar, Jesús
dc.contributor.author
Suárez Sipmann, Fernando
dc.contributor.author
COVID-19 Spanish ICU Network
dc.date.issued
2021-06-08T10:20:15Z
dc.date.issued
2021-06-08T10:20:15Z
dc.date.issued
2020-10-06
dc.date.issued
2021-06-08T10:20:15Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178141
dc.description.abstract
Background: Awake prone positioning (awake-PP) in non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients could avoid endotracheal intubation, reduce the use of critical care resources, and improve survival. We aimed to examine whether the combination of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) with awake-PP prevents the need for intubation when compared to HFNO alone. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, adjusted observational cohort study in consecutive COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) receiving respiratory support with HFNO from 12 March to 9 June 2020. Patients were classified as HFNO with or without awake-PP. Logistic models were fitted to predict treatment at baseline using the following variables: age, sex, obesity, non-respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, APACHE-II, C-reactive protein, days from symptoms onset to HFNO initiation, respiratory rate, and peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation. We compared data on demographics, vital signs, laboratory markers, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, days to intubation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality between HFNO patients with and without awake-PP. Results: A total of 1076 patients with COVID-19 ARF were admitted, of which 199 patients received HFNO and were analyzed. Fifty-five (27.6%) were pronated during HFNO; 60 (41%) and 22 (40%) patients from the HFNO and HFNO + awake-PP groups were intubated. The use of awake-PP as an adjunctive therapy to HFNO did not reduce the risk of intubation [RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.53-1.43), p = 0.60]. Patients treated with HFNO + awake-PP showed a trend for delay in intubation compared to HFNO alone [median 1 (interquartile range, IQR 1.0-2.5) vs 2 IQR 1.0-3.0] days (p = 0.055), but awake-PP did not affect 28-day mortality [RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.40-2.72), p = 0.92].Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19 ARF treated with HFNO, the use of awake-PP did not reduce the need for intubation or affect mortality.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03314-6
dc.relation
Critical Care, 2020, vol. 24, num. 597
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03314-6
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Ferrando, Carlos et al., 2020
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Insuficiència respiratòria
dc.subject
Unitats de cures intensives
dc.subject
Respiració artificial
dc.subject
Respiratory insufficiency
dc.subject
Intensive care units
dc.subject
Artificial respiration
dc.title
Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: a multicenter, adjusted cohort study
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion