Time and tumor type (primary or metastatic) do not influence the detection of BRAF/NRAS mutations in formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples from melanomas.

Author

Potrony Mateu, Míriam

Badenas Orquin, Celia

Naerhuyzen, Bénédicte

Aguilera, Paula

Puig Butillé, Joan Anton

Tell Martí, Gemma

Díaz Lorca, Maria Alba

Carrera Álvarez, Cristina

Alós i Hernández, Llúcia

Delahaye, Nicolas

Malvehy, J. (Josep)

Puig i Sardà, Susana

Publication date

2017-04-13T12:03:13Z

2017-04-13T12:03:13Z

2016-11-01

2017-04-13T12:03:13Z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BRAF and NRAS mutation detection is crucial for advanced melanoma treatment. Our aim was to evaluate how different characteristics from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, age of the block or DNA concentration could influence the success of BRAF and NRAS mutational screening. METHODS: DNA was obtained from 144 FFPE samples (62 primary melanoma, 43 sentinel lymph nodes [SLN] and 39 metastasis). BRAF and NRAS were sequenced by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Complete sequencing results were obtained from 75% (108/144) of the samples, and at least one gene was sequenced in 89% (128/144) of them. BRAF was mutated in 55% (29/53) and NRAS in 11% (5/45) of the primary melanomas sequenced. DNA concentration correlated with the tumor area used for DNA extraction (mm2) (adj p-value<0.01, r=0.73). The age of the block did not affect sequencing success. In 60% of samples kept for more than 10 years, both BRAF and NRAS were successfully sequenced. CONCLUSIONS: Preserving sufficient tumor area in FFPE blocks is important. It is necessary to keep the FFPE blocks, no matter their age, as they are necessary to decide the best treatment for the melanoma patient.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Melanoma; Tumors; Mutació (Biologia); Melanoma; Tumors; Mutation (Biology)

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-1048

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2016, vol. 54, num. 11, p. 1733-1738

https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-1048

Rights

(c) Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG., 2016