EUS-guided tissue acquisition in the study of the adrenal glands: Results of a nationwide multicenter study

Author

Martín Cardona, Albert

Fernández Esparrach, Glòria

Subtil, J. C.

Iglesias García, J.

García Guix, Marta

Barturen Barroso, A.

Gimeno García, A. Z.

Esteban, J. M.

Pardo Balteiro, A.

Velasco Guardado, A.

Vázquez-Sequeiros, Enrique

Loras Alastruey, Carme

Martínez Moreno, B.

Castellot, A.

Huertas, Carlos

Martínez Lapiedra, M.

Sánchez Yagüe, Andrés

Terán, A.

Morales Alvarado, Víctor Jair

Betes, M.

Iglesia, D. de la

Sánchez Montes, Cristina

Lozano, Maria Dolores

Lariño Noia, J.

Ginés, A.

Tebé, Cristian

Gornals Soler, Joan B.

Spanish Group for EUS-Guided TA in the adrenal gland

Publication date

2020-01-29T15:06:46Z

2020-01-29T15:06:46Z

2019-06-06

2020-01-29T15:06:46Z

Abstract

Background: There are limited data about the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), by fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB), in the evaluation of the adrenal glands (AG). The primary aim was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety. The secondary aims were the malignancy predictors, and to create a predictive model of malignancy. Methods: This was a retrospective nationwide study involving all Spanish hospitals experienced in EUS-TA of AGs. Inclusion period was from April-2003 to April-2016. Inclusion criteria: all consecutive cases that underwent EUS-TA of AGs. EUS and cytopathology findings were evaluated. Statistical analyses: diagnostic accuracy of echoendoscopist's suspicion using cytology by EUS-TA, as gold standard; multivariate logistic regression model to predict tumor malignancy. Results: A total of 204 EUS-TA of AGs were evaluated. Primary tumor locations were lung70%, others19%, and unknown11%. AG samples were adequate for cytological diagnosis in 91%, and confirmed malignancy in 60%. Diagnostic accuracy of the endosonographer's suspicion was 68%. The most common technique was: a 22-G (65%) and cytological needle (75%) with suction-syringe (66%). No serious adverse events were described. The variables most associated with malignancy were size>30mm (OR2.27; 95%CI, 1.16-4.05), heterogeneous echo-pattern (OR2.11; 95%CI, 1.1-3.9), variegated AG shape (OR2.46; 95%CI, 1-6.24), and endosonographer suspicion (OR17.46; 95%CI, 6.2-58.5). The best variables for a predictive multivariate logistic model of malignancy were age, sex, echo-pattern, and AG-shape. Conclusions: EUS-TA of the AGs is a safe, minimally invasive procedure, allowing an excellent diagnostic yield. These results suggest the possibility of developing a pre-EUS procedure predictive malignancy model.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Diagnòstic; Càncer; Endoscòpia; Diagnosis; Cancer; Endoscopy

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216658

PLoS One, 2019, vol. 14, num. 6, p. e0216658

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216658

Rights

cc-by (c) Martín Cardona, Albert et al., 2019

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es